Re: [PrimeNumbers] Confused by Iwaniec and Pintz
- Hello Bill,
> Because 2n+1 = 2(k^(.5)-1)+1 is always greater than k^(23/42)it doesn't since 23/42 > 1/2.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- OOPS! Thanks to all who responded with an answer to "what I was
missing" - my inequality statement was obviously incorrect.