Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [PrimeNumbers] Building Twin Primes II

Expand Messages
  • Milton Brown
    Yes, obviously. And, you point is?
    Message 1 of 6 , Jun 8, 2005
    • 0 Attachment
      Yes, obviously.

      And, you point is?


      > [Original Message]
      > From: Jud McCranie <j.mccranie@...>
      > To: <miltbrown@...>
      > Cc: primenumbers <primenumbers@yahoogroups.com>
      > Date: 6/8/2005 7:29:38 PM
      > Subject: Re: [PrimeNumbers] Building Twin Primes II
      >
      > At 06:04 PM 6/8/2005, Milton Brown wrote:
      > >All twin primes after (29,31) are built as 30*k + (11,13) or +(17,19) or
      > >+(29,31)
      >
      > Isn't that the same thing as saying that they are either 11 & 13, or 17 &
      > 19, or 29 & 31 mod 30?
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > Unsubscribe by an email to: primenumbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      > The Prime Pages : http://www.primepages.org/
      >
      >
      > Yahoo! Groups Links
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
    • Jud McCranie
      ... My point is - what is your point? Your observation says nothing new.
      Message 2 of 6 , Jun 8, 2005
      • 0 Attachment
        At 01:07 AM 6/9/2005, Milton Brown wrote:
        >Yes, obviously.
        >
        >And, you point is?

        My point is - what is your point? Your observation says nothing new.
      • Jud McCranie
        ... Well, the first counterexample is k=23, (701,703) (707,709) (719,721) The next few counterexamples are 31, 37, 41, 61, 73, 83, 97.
        Message 3 of 6 , Jun 8, 2005
        • 0 Attachment
          At 06:04 PM 6/8/2005, Milton Brown wrote:
          >All twin primes after (29,31) are built as 30*k + (11,13) or +(17,19) or
          >+(29,31)
          >
          >Attached is a table for k from 1 to 20 showing their construction.
          >
          >The assertion is that for every k which is prime, there is at least one
          >of the 3 additions which produces a twin prime.

          Well, the first counterexample is k=23,
          (701,703)
          (707,709)
          (719,721)

          The next few counterexamples are 31, 37, 41, 61, 73, 83, 97.
        Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.