- Golden Number linked to 666

Formal Proof needed

Hello,

While working on my websites on 666 Myth (

http://www.666myth.co.nr/ French = http://www.666mythe.co.nr/ ),

on Pope Benedict 16 - Mark 666 (

http://www.chez.com/cosmos2000/Forums/NEWS_MemoryPopeJohnPaul_II.html

) and on Isomorphous Triplets (

http://www.chez.com/cosmos2000/Numbers/IsomorphousTriplets.html ), I

have found recently direct links between the Beast Number 666 and

the famous Golden Number Phi, well-known by Pythagoras, Leonardo da

Vinci ... and in Sacred Geometry, in architecture and many natural

phenomenons. This unexpected and incredible relation 666 versus Phi

may constitute a way for the Rehabilitation of 666 !!! ...

First we have this curious relations:

666 = 7^3 pi (Phi 1) = 7^3 pi phi or 666 = (6/5) 7^3 Phi

with pi = 3.141593 Phi = 1.618034 phi = Phi -1 =

0.618034 and 7^3 = cubic of 7

Besides, after computing some sinus and cosines [a good online

Trigonometry calculator available at

http://www.1728.com/trigcalc.htm ], expressed in Degrees and

absolute values, we obtain:

Phi /2 = sin 666º = cos 324º = cos 216º = cos 144º = cos 36º =

0.80901699...

Phi = 2sin 666º = 2cos 324º = 2cos 216º = 2cos 144º = 2cos 36º =

1,61803399...

Phi = sin 666º + cos 216º = sin 666º + cos (6x6x6)º

Phi = cos 144º + cos 36º = cos [(6+6) x (6+6)]º + cos (6 x 6)º

Phi = sin 666º + cos 144º = sin 666º + cos [(6+6) x (6+6)]º

But, I am wondering if there could exist formal mathematical proofs

for this 666 and Golden Number links.

Thanks for advice and help. - This post is proof positive that moderation should be turned on by default on

the list.

Would you mind to leave our list alone, crackpot?

Décio

On Sunday 01 May 2005 19:37, you wrote:

> Golden Number linked to 666

> Formal Proof needed

>

> Hello,

>

> While working on my websites on 666 Myth (

> http://www.666myth.co.nr/ French = http://www.666mythe.co.nr/ ),

> on Pope Benedict 16 - Mark 666 (

> http://www.chez.com/cosmos2000/Forums/NEWS_MemoryPopeJohnPaul_II.html

> ) and on Isomorphous Triplets (

> http://www.chez.com/cosmos2000/Numbers/IsomorphousTriplets.html ), I

> have found recently direct links between the Beast Number 666 and

> the famous Golden Number Phi, well-known by Pythagoras, Leonardo da

> Vinci ... and in Sacred Geometry, in architecture and many natural

> phenomenons. This unexpected and incredible relation 666 versus Phi

> may constitute a way for the Rehabilitation of 666 !!! ...

>

> First we have this curious relations:

>

> 666 = 7^3 pi (Phi 1) = 7^3 pi phi or 666 = (6/5) 7^3 Phi

> with pi = 3.141593 Phi = 1.618034 phi = Phi -1 =

> 0.618034 and 7^3 = cubic of 7

>

> Besides, after computing some sinus and cosines [a good online

> Trigonometry calculator available at

> http://www.1728.com/trigcalc.htm ], expressed in Degrees and

> absolute values, we obtain:

>

> Phi /2 = sin 666º = cos 324º = cos 216º = cos 144º = cos 36º =

> 0.80901699...

> Phi = 2sin 666º = 2cos 324º = 2cos 216º = 2cos 144º = 2cos 36º =

> 1,61803399...

> Phi = sin 666º + cos 216º = sin 666º + cos (6x6x6)º

> Phi = cos 144º + cos 36º = cos [(6+6) x (6+6)]º + cos (6 x 6)º

> Phi = sin 666º + cos 144º = sin 666º + cos [(6+6) x (6+6)]º

>

> But, I am wondering if there could exist formal mathematical proofs

> for this 666 and Golden Number links.

>

> Thanks for advice and help.

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Unsubscribe by an email to: primenumbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

> The Prime Pages : http://www.primepages.org/

>

>

> Yahoo! Groups Links

>

>

>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] - --- In primenumbers@yahoogroups.com, Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho

<decio@d...> wrote:> This post is proof positive that moderation should be turned on by

default on

> the list.

snip

>

> Would you mind to leave our list alone, crackpot?

>

> Décio

>

> On Sunday 01 May 2005 19:37, you wrote:

> > Golden Number linked to 666

> > Formal Proof needed

> >

> > Hello,

> >

> > While working on my websites on 666 Myth (

I would leave it just as a myth and not try to prove a thing with

this subject. In fact, I am with Décio.

John