## Surface Area generator/sieve

Expand Messages
• Hello, 1. take any number, factor it to the primes; e.g.8=2*2*2. 2. calculate the surface area; e.g. 6*(2*2)=24 3. add or subtract 1; e.g. 24-1=23 4. get a
Message 1 of 11 , Jul 2, 2001
Hello,

1. take any number, factor it to the primes;
e.g.8=2*2*2.
2. calculate the surface area; e.g. 6*(2*2)=24
3. add or subtract 1; e.g. 24-1=23
4. get a higher prime than the constituent primes of
the composite factored.
5. those primes with only 1 factor must use 1 as the
other factor. But I also conject that you may use as
many number 1's as desired and will still get a prime.
6. if 2-dimensional, then use the perimeter, but may
also use 1 as many times as like to create any
n-dimensional figure and surface area +,- will be a
higher prime than the constituent primes of number
factored.

I'm probably suffering, per usual, from looking at too
small numbers. Could someone find counter examples,
preferably groups of counter examples. Also can
someone shed light on surface areas of 4th, 5th etc
dimensional surface area calculations.

Thanks,

Bill
--- Andrey Kulsha <Andrey_601@...> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Milton Brown wrote:
>
> > Because it would take at least 2 months to
> > certify, presumably.
>
> It isn't the reason. If you find enough curious
> properties of this number, G.L.
> Honaker perhaps will publish it even if it's only a
> PRP.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Andrey
>
>
>

=====
Bill Krys
Email: billkrys@...

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
• hello, it appears the constant to subtract from the surface area increases as the surface area increases. Bill ===== Bill Krys Email: billkrys@yahoo.com
Message 2 of 11 , Jul 2, 2001
hello,

it appears the constant to subtract from the surface
area increases as the surface area increases.

Bill

=====
Bill Krys
Email: billkrys@...

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
• hello, more primes pop out if one permits a negative sign on the factors and then taking the absolute value after calculating. Bill ... ===== Bill Krys Email:
Message 3 of 11 , Jul 2, 2001
hello,

more primes pop out if one permits a negative sign on
the factors and then taking the absolute value after
calculating.

Bill

--- Bill Krys <billkrys@...> wrote:
> hello,
>
> it appears the constant to subtract from the surface
> area increases as the surface area increases.
>
> Bill
>
> =====
> Bill Krys
> Email: billkrys@...
> Toronto, Canada (currently: Beijing, China)
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
> http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
>

=====
Bill Krys
Email: billkrys@...

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
• ... I sincerely trust that G.L. will not! I just checked: all of G.L. s entries with more than 1k digits are proven (and all with less digits jolly well
Message 4 of 11 , Jul 2, 2001
Andrey Kulsha wrote:
> G.L. Honaker perhaps will publish it even if it's only a PRP.
I sincerely trust that G.L. will not!
I just checked: all of G.L.'s entries with
more than 1k digits are proven
(and all with less digits jolly well *ought* to be, too!)
David
• Hello! ... PC_1292: Some weeks ago was The first 1292 digits of 1293^1294 form a PRP PC_141...021: Note that the first 6205 form a titanic probable prime.
Message 5 of 11 , Jul 2, 2001
Hello!

> I just checked: all of G.L.'s entries with
> more than 1k digits are proven
> (and all with less digits jolly well *ought* to be, too!)
> David

PC_1292: Some weeks ago was "The first 1292 digits of 1293^1294 form a PRP"
PC_141...021: "Note that the first 6205 form a titanic probable prime."

I believe that some very fine PRP may be published at PC pages.

Best wishes,

Andrey
• ... Yes, I see what you mean, now, Andrey, thanks. We are both right. G.L. does not post merely PrPs at their digital positions, but may refer to them, in
Message 6 of 11 , Jul 2, 2001
Andrey Kulsha wrote:

> PC_1292: Some weeks ago was
> "The first 1292 digits of 1293^1294 form a PRP"

> PC_141...021: "Note that the first 6205 form
> a titanic probable prime."

Yes, I see what you mean, now, Andrey, thanks.

We are both right.

G.L. does not post merely PrPs at their "digital"
positions, but may refer to them, in passing,
by smaller entries.

In fact, I see that the second of these PrPs, in
http://www.utm.edu/research/primes/curios/141...021.html
was communicated by me.
But please note that I was meticulous in
demoting it to its truly inferior status.

David
Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.