After the bad news, a better one for LLRP4 users.
- While correcting the pure LLR bug in LLRP4, I saw that the program can
detect the numbers that gave incorrect results with the present
version, at init, that is to say before doing the test (no matter the
number is prime or composite), so I will make an option in the ini
file to allow users to test again only these numbers, and skip the
test for the numbers which were already tested correctly (and which, I
hope, are much more numerous). Unfortunatly, this feature can only
work for k's up to 22 bits, so the big k tests must all be redone...
Also I have successfully tested the candidates in reisel3.txt up to
the 3929th for now.
About the little k's (k<300) I can say that I tested successfully the
version you are using on all the candidates in Wilfrid Keller "riesel"