RE A proof for the Riemann Hypothesis?
> ----- Original Message -----the
> From: "David Cleaver" <wraithx@...>
> > It looks like the apology is separate from the proof. The apology is 23
> > pages and gives a lot of personal history and other mathematical details
> > which I don't understand. But, as I saw someone point out, on his page
> > located at:
> > http://www.math.purdue.edu/~branges/
> > It looks like the actual proof is the "Riemann zeta functions" pdf file,
> > 3rd link down, on that page. It weighs in at a hefty 124 pages. The
> > direct link to the pdf is here:
> > http://www.math.purdue.edu/ftp_pub/branges/riemannzeta.pdf
> > Just thought I'd clear that up because I know originally it confused me.
> > -David C.
> That makes sense. I arrived to the Apology by a link in the news. I didn't
> know what it meant by "apology", first I thought someone had invalidated
> proof and the author was apologizing; but I read several pages and itlooked
> like an introduction to the Riemann Hypothesis, so I thought it was thegood
> Jose Brox