Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

RE A proof for the Riemann Hypothesis?

Expand Messages
  • Jose Ramón Brox
    ... the ... looked ... good
    Message 1 of 1 , Jun 10, 2004
      > ----- Original Message -----
      > From: "David Cleaver" <wraithx@...>
      >
      >
      > > It looks like the apology is separate from the proof. The apology is 23
      > > pages and gives a lot of personal history and other mathematical details
      > > which I don't understand. But, as I saw someone point out, on his page
      > > located at:
      > > http://www.math.purdue.edu/~branges/
      > > It looks like the actual proof is the "Riemann zeta functions" pdf file,
      > > 3rd link down, on that page. It weighs in at a hefty 124 pages. The
      > > direct link to the pdf is here:
      > > http://www.math.purdue.edu/ftp_pub/branges/riemannzeta.pdf
      > > Just thought I'd clear that up because I know originally it confused me.
      > >
      > > -David C.
      >
      > That makes sense. I arrived to the Apology by a link in the news. I didn't
      > know what it meant by "apology", first I thought someone had invalidated
      the
      > proof and the author was apologizing; but I read several pages and it
      looked
      > like an introduction to the Riemann Hypothesis, so I thought it was the
      good
      > one.
      >
      > Jose Brox
      >
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.