Re: Upgraded LLR program BUG
- --- In email@example.com, "andrew_j_walker" <ajw01@u...>
>Thanks to everyone who replied to me. To summarise, the link
> Can someone please let me know the most up to date source for
> k*2^n-1 ranges reserved. According to
> k=23 has been tested to , is this still accurate? I'd
> like to reserve it and search a bit higher.
> Andrew Walker
above is as accurate as it could be, it appears many people have
searched higher without informing Wilfred!
http://www.15k.org/ has a search for multiples of 15*k*2^n-1
and for k*2^n-1 for k<300. I'm going to start k=5 which will largely
be verification for small k.