Re: [PrimeNumbers] "Nearly infinite"
- At 08:28 AM 10/31/2003, xed wrote:
>Yes, Roger Bagula is completely off the mark here. The problem arises whenIn the extended reals and extended complex numbers, it makes sense to talk
>he claims that his quantities get "nearly infinite." Kiddo, infinity is like
>pregnancy -- there ain't no "almost." Either a product is infinite, or it
>isn't. "Nearly infinite" is like "semi-pregnant": meaningless.
about something being close to infinity because there is a distance function.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]