7832Re: composite trinomials
- Jul 2, 2002Bouk wrote:
> --- I wrote:I should watch my grammar!
> > Hi,
> > I have just seen these:
> > 9999 2^65536-2^256+1 19729 x37 02 prime #0207
> > 9999 2^262144-2^512+1 78914 x37 02 #0207
> > which look improbable and a BLS no-hoper.
> > PFGW Version 20020515.Win_Dev (Beta software, 'caveat utilitor')
> Sorry, BOTH are not prp. I thought Paul only meant the largest one.
If you want a challange, dislodge some of my gigantic PRP trinomials
at Henri's site:
If you can't do that I can generate a challanging one if you like!
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>