- Sep 4, 2001Hello Tom,
A nice observation and I will amend the paper so that the
Binomial prime `theorem' is a definition. But just a small comment.
Your example seems to be a contradiction but in fact you are
comparing a Binomial (2 + 1/5)^3 and a monomial (11/5)^3. :-). How
does one expand a monomial? How long is a piece of string? What
matters is that a consistent framework is developed and that is why
maths is fun. If you think that Andrew Wiles et al have approached
the problem of modulo rational arithmetic any other way you are in
for a pleasant surprise. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. If it is
broke, define! Stay tuned as you see the end of my proof in version
2 and can you guess where it ends? No, it doesn't use Logical
Resonance! Something much more visual.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>