24051Re: [PrimeNumbers] Re: ...factorizer to break RSA...
- Feb 15, 2012On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 18:26 +0000, Phil Carmody wrote:
> And is the title of the paper also shrouded in obscurity that you'reTwo things.
> sworn not to reveal, or was that just an oversight in your attempt to
> swiftly assert that the algorithm I hadn't even yet told you about
> could never work?
1) Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by
2) I never said your algorithm couldn't work, only that it might not be
as easy to implement and run as it is to assert that you have an
> Does it just refer to the fact that the *R*SA with multiple primeYup.
> secrets is "wrong" compared the single prime secred of *D*H?
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>