21251Re: [PrimeNumbers] Re: Set of prime numbers
- Jan 3, 2010--- On Wed, 12/23/09, Paul Leyland <paul@...> wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 23:54 +0000, Phil Carmody wrote:That looks like the choice of 60 precisely because of its divisibility properties. They didn't take the LCM and later make a shock discovery that it had all the factors of the two original numbers, shall we say.
> > > > published by Eratosthenes some 2200 years ago,
> > > > and was certainly known some 1000
> > > > (maybe 25 000) years earlier.
> > >
> > > I'm intrigued by the "certainly";
> > > I would have said "probably" for 1k BCE.
> > I'd have said "definitely" for >3k BCE. Base 60 just screams
> > knowledge of divisibility properties.
> Sorry for the late response to this thread but I've been
> rather tied up
> with Real Life(tm) recently.
> There is a persuasive suggestion that the divisibility
> properties of
> radix-60 arithmetic is a consequence of its choice, not a
> reason for its
> choice. The argument goes as follows.
> A number of cultures have independently invented quinary
> arithmetic, for
> reasons which should be obvious. There are still
> relics of this in
> modern culture --- the five-bar-gate tallying method, for
> Bi-quinary has also been widely used throughout
> history. This uses four
> different symbols for the digits 1-4 (the symbols are
> frequently 1 to 4
> identical lines or dots) and another symbol for 5.
> Digits 6 through 9
> are then represented by the juxtaposition of the 5-symbol
> and the
> appropriate symbol for 1 through 4.
> A number of cultures have independently invented duodecimal
> Many relics of this exist: 12 ounces to the Troy pound; 12
> inches to the
> foot; 12 pennies to the shilling and so on. The most
> survivors to my mind are the survival of the English words
> "dozen" and
> Some time around 4000 to 3500 BCE the Sumerians moved into
> and merged with a pre-existing culture. One culture
> used quinary or
> bi-quinary and the other
> duodecimal. Neither culture supplanted the
> other, rather their notations
> merged. Indeed, the symbols of early
> Mesopotamian arithmetic and accounting documents show
> strong evidence
> for a bi-quinary (later decimal) sub-structure in the
- << Previous post in topic