19672Re: [PrimeNumbers] Re: Tightened-Lightened Goldbach Conjecture
- Nov 4, 2008Mark,
I'm going to make you a gentleman's bet that I can get a prime pair generated for each unique N and that each and every N will be used once and only once (I think it'll ultimately depend on what ineger I start with). I'm speculating and you know I have little formal knowledge to back it up, and furthermore, I realize there are many seductive patterns seen in numbers that just don't survive once one gets up in numbers, and finally I've been proved wrong so many times, I should probably know better, but a bet will add a little spice to this tedious exercise. Will you take it on?
P.S. Thanks for your past response and insight.
This communication is intended for the use of the recipient to which it is addressed, and may contain confidential, personal, and or privileged information. Please contact the sender immediately if you are not the intended recipient of this communication, and do not copy, distribute, or take action relying on it. Any communication received in error, or subsequent reply, should be deleted or destroyed.
--- On Fri, 10/31/08, Mark Underwood <mark.underwood@...> wrote:
From: Mark Underwood <mark.underwood@...>
Subject: [PrimeNumbers] Re: Tightened-Lightened Goldbach Conjecture
Date: Friday, October 31, 2008, 6:17 PM
--- In primenumbers@ yahoogroups. com, "billkrys" <billkrys@.. .> wrote:
> given that Goldbach's Conjecture for even #s can be re-stated as there
> is a prime equi-distant (N = integer) on either side of all integers
> (I), then is there a unique N for each integer such that each N is used
> once and only once and where all N's can be represented above some
> minimum I?
> In other words, can a prime pair be created for each integer (above 4
> or some other integer - and then what is it?) from each N, such that a
> prime pair is created as a function of N? In yet more other words, the
> Conjecture would be tightened by becoming a function and lightened by
> being only concerned with 1 pair of primes for each integer.
> Is there more than 1 function depending on what I - and for that
> matter, depending on what N - one starts with?
> I'm trying to create such a function but am doing it without a program,
> so it will take time - trial and error.
Interesting idea. I'm almost certain there would be no function of N
which would generate a unique I. But the idea that there might be a
unique I that can be mapped to each N over a certain range is
For instance, for N from 7 to 30 (as far as I checked, by hand) there
is a unique I such that N+I and N-I is prime: (N,I)
(7,4) (8,3) (9,2) (10,7) (11,6) (12,1) (13,10) (14,9) (15,8) (16,13)
(17,14) (18,5) (19,12) (20,17) (21,16) (22,15) (23,18) (24,19) (25,22)
(26,21) (27,20) (28,25) (29,24) (30,11)
This is just one of many possibilities. But, I strongly suppose that
this particular one, and probably all of them, will fail at some
higher N. But, how far can one go, that is the question....
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>