Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

1007Re: Factor Record

Expand Messages
  • d.broadhurst@open.ac.uk
    Apr 27, 2001
    • 0 Attachment
      Paul Mills wrote

      > David Broadhurst has improved ...

      No. I merely reduced your idea to absurdity:

      > Of course you can only use 1 theorem once in any form,

      Try to imagine a mathematician saying: of course this proof of
      divisibility is invalid because it uses Fermat's theorem twice.

      Difficult to get more absurd than that.

      Please don't try :-)

    • Show all 12 messages in this topic