Re: [prezveepsenator] Re: Happy Election Day
- Yes,I gained my respect for you in the Presidents
group, which is why I'm even discussing it. I know you
can be open-minded. Don't take our word for it, but
maybe do a little research. Check out the 9/11
commission report, and of the Republican led House or
Senate reports, any of the intelligence reports, any
major news outlet besides Fox News. In fact any
credible source except for Dick Cheney or Fox. The
evidence is overwhelming.
--- Randal Brown <as_is_35@...> wrote:
> Well the short answer Thomas is yes I do. I do=== message truncated ===
> believe that Saddam played a role in 9/11.
> THOMAS JOHNSON <AVRCRDNG@...> wrote:
> Randal.. I have a lot of respect for you, and as
> I ask you this respectfully. Do you believe that
> Saddam Hussein was responsible or played any role in
> the 9/11 attacks?
> --- Randal Brown <as_is_35@...> wrote:
> > I would like to correct that comment. I was in the
> > process of saying something else when I wrote that
> > and got interrupted. What I meant to write was
> > Democrats want control of Congress to do away with
> > the Bush agenda on the war on Iraq." I do
> > for that comment.
> > But Gregory I must say as someone who has served
> > in the military, that war is hell. I know that is
> > harsh statement, but its the truth. Iraq is the
> > center of the terrorists hub in the Middle East. I
> > don't know how many times that has to be proven
> > before people get that. Just stop to think about
> > this. If we hadn't invaded Iraq, it would still be
> > ruled by a hearltess, cruel dictator. It would not
> > be on its way to being a "free country." And I
> > would personally wager that if Saddam hadn't been
> > captured, there WOULD have been more attacks on
> > America. I don't care what anyone says, Iraq
> > did/does have WMD'S. Its just a matter of finding
> > them.
> > Gregory I hope this doesn't intefere with the
> > cordial friendship we've had over the years. I did
> > mess up what I said earlier and I truly do regret
> > that comment. And to everyone else I do not say
> > these things to upset anyone, but I believe in my
> > ideas just as much as you do.
> > Randal
> > Gregory <greggolopry@...> wrote:
> > Dear Randal,
> > You write, "The Democrats want control of Congress
> > because they don't
> > believe in protecting America or Americans. And
> > their record shows
> > that."
> > I think that is shameful statement!
> > A friend sent me a political cartoon recently
> > showing how many
> > American troops have been killed in our efforts to
> > avenge the
> > terrorist attacks on 9/11 in New York and
> > Washington, D.C. In a
> > simple drawing the madness of our foreign policy
> > most visible.
> > The fact that we invaded a country in the Middle
> > East that was not
> > involved with 9/11, and have suffered thousands of
> > deaths as a
> > result, while Afghanistan, a true player in the
> > terrorist attacks, is
> > being lost militarily due to a lack of manpower or
> > well thought out
> > strategy, should enrage everyone.
> > But I guess you see those actions as being
> > patriotic. I guess you
> > see those failed actions as protecting our
> > The public is tired of being lied to, and spied
> > They are tired of
> > those who never truly served in the military in
> > their youth, now
> > starting wars while in public office, and as a
> > result making the
> > world a much more unsafe place. They are tired of
> > being led to
> > believe there ever was a war on terror being
> > conducted in Iraq, but
> > instead now know it was a political decision by
> > President Bush and
> > Dick Cheney that had nothing to do with our
> > security.
> > The American public knows what is going on, and
> > latest polling
> > not only shows what the issues are that need
> > changing, but which
> > political party they best trust to get the job
> > The political
> > chaos of the Republican campaign shows they have
> > nothing left to
> > offer except mean-spiritedness and bankrupt ideas.
> > This year the
> > public is listening, watching, and is now voting
> > Gregory
> > --- In email@example.com, Randal
> > <as_is_35@...>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I would like to take the opportunity to urge
> > of you to go vote
> > today. I did first thing this morning.
> > >
> > > I don't normally write messages like this, but I
> > am only because
> > I feel so very strongly about it.
> > >
> > > If you are a ardent Democrat and are going to
> > Democratic
> > irregardless of what anyone says, then you might
> > well stop reading
> > this email and delete it, because you are not
> > to like this
> > email.
> > >
> > > I know that here in the USA we have the inherit
> > right to vote how
> > we want. But I personally am tired of only ever
> > really hearing half
> > the story. I don't pay attention to national
> > I think they are
> > just propaganda. If we had listened to the "exit
> > polls" in 2000 and
> > 2004 then Al Gore and/or John Kerry would have
> > elected
> > President.
> > >
> > > If Democrats gain control of Congress, then that
> > will mean that
> > Nancy Polowski (D) California will become the
> > Speaker of the House.
> > Third in line for the Presidency. I cannot express
> > my true concern
> > about this. It has nothing to do with the fact
> > she is a woman.
> > It has to do that this woman is just absolutely
> > horrible.
> > >
> > > Ms. Polowski has voted for EVERY tax hike that
> > come before
> > the Congress. She voted AGAINST the Bush tax cuts.
> > She voted
> > AGAINST the development of the Homeland Security
> > Department. She
> > voted AGAINST the NSA wire taps. I know that is
> > issue, but the
> > way I look at it is, if you don't have anything to
> > hide, then what is
> > the harm.
> > >
> > > The Democrats want control of Congress because
> > they don't believe
> > in protecting America or Americans. And their
> > shows that.
> > >
> > > However, not all Democrats are bad. I'm not
> > completely knocking
> > the Democratic party. I know there are honest,
> > caring Democratic
> > leaders. There are just a few like Nancy Polowski,
> > Hillary Clinton
> > and Ted Kennedy to name a few that are just plain
> > dangerous.
> > >