Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Immoral Majority

Expand Messages
  • Gregory
    Immoral Majority By Eugene Robinson Washinton Post Friday, September 30, 2005; Page A19 What s the difference between the Republican Party then and the
    Message 1 of 1 , Sep 29, 2005
    • 0 Attachment
      Immoral Majority

      By Eugene Robinson
      Washinton Post

      Friday, September 30, 2005; Page A19

      What's the difference between the Republican Party then and the
      Republican Party now ? Here's an illustration: Richard Nixon was the
      president who established the Environmental Protection Agency.
      Tom "The Hammer" DeLay is the congressman who called the EPA a latter-
      day "Gestapo."

      So pardon me for going way beyond schadenfreude to outright giddiness
      at the prospect that the Hammer will finally get nailed.

      It may be too much to hope that the former House majority leader --
      and how good it feels to write "former" -- will actually be convicted
      and do jail time. The indictment for criminal conspiracy returned by
      a Texas grand jury on Wednesday is for alleged campaign finance
      violations that are the rough equivalent of money laundering, which
      is not the easiest crime to prove in court.

      But DeLay's problems are bigger than Texas. His golf-buddy
      relationship with Jack Abramoff, a fat-cat lobbyist under federal
      indictment, will face months of scrutiny. DeLay's resignation from
      the House leadership is supposed to be temporary, but Republicans
      ignored his wishes and picked a strong successor who could serve out
      the rest of this Congress if necessary. Clearly they believe their
      former leader will be distracted for some time.

      Which makes me feel like it's morning again in America.

      DeLay, because he's such a ruthlessly effective bully, has been as
      responsible as anyone for pushing his party to the end of the
      political spectrum previously reserved for the anti-everything, loony-
      bin far right. His comeuppance is an occasion to remind ourselves
      just what a long, strange trip it's been.

      There was a time when the conservative movement in this country was
      the preserve of principled eccentrics such as Barry Goldwater. These
      days Goldwater would be thought of as a libertarian more than
      anything else, a firm believer that what people really needed was a
      good leaving-alone. In his prime, he occupied fringe territory that
      was light-years from the mainstream.

      Ronald Reagan changed everything, shifting the nation's center of
      gravity to the right. In retrospect, whatever you thought of Reagan's
      policies -- and I didn't like them -- the man at least had a certain
      generosity of spirit. His idea of the black experience in America may
      have been Sammy Davis Jr.'s career, his views of women may have been
      antediluvian and his impression of gay people may have come
      exclusively from dining with Nancy's friends, but at least he had
      some experience of people unlike himself and an appreciation of their
      humanity.

      The crowd now in control of Washington, thanks in part to DeLay's
      undeniable skills, could best be described as Reagan's illegitimate
      heirs.

      Theirs is a greedy, small-minded conservatism. In their policies,
      they seek not to improve government, and certainly not to shrink it,
      but to ruin it -- to starve the regulatory agencies with tax cuts,
      then spend so wildly on pork that there's nothing left to pay for
      actual government work such as, say, preparing for a hurricane.

      The Republican Party's "small government" rhetoric is hilarious, but
      while you're laughing, keep a grip on your wallet. Since 2000, the
      number of registered lobbyists in Washington has more than doubled,
      to an astonishing 34,750. That's a lot of mouths at the trough.

      DeLay and Co. don't just want to bankrupt the government, they want
      to force the whole country to conform to their "moral" prescriptions.
      On private matters such as abortion, homosexuality, religion, even
      end-of-life decisions, they demand that all of us do as they say.
      When it comes to the millions who lack health insurance, though, or
      to persistent poverty in the inner cities -- well, those problems are
      for individuals and "faith-based" institutions to grapple with as
      best they can.

      DeLay was clever enough to see that if a few more safe GOP seats
      could be engineered in Texas, Democrats would need a tidal wave of
      votes to regain control. The political action committee he formed to
      get these seats redistricted into existence, Texans for a Republican
      Majority, came under the scrutiny of the Travis County district
      attorney, Ronnie Earle, and that scrutiny led to DeLay's indictment.

      I like the irony that DeLay may end up a victim of hubris -- that his
      downfall may result from his efforts to perpetuate his awful legacy.
      But if it comes from the Abramoff probe or somewhere else, I won't
      complain. He doesn't even have to go to jail; he can just go back to
      killing bugs in Houston. Just as long as he goes. This will be a
      better country when that "former" in front of his title is permanent.
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.