5728Re: [prbytes] Blogger addresses?
- Jan 5, 2012Oh no, don't do that, Lois. You're right 200 bloggers that's too much. Why
don't you do a google search with the keywords PR and bloggers? You should
find wikis. I'm listed in a few. I didn't know you wanted PR bloggers.
There are PR social media bloggers, PR/publicity business bloggers...
Narrow down your search. Maybe that will make them easier to access.
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Kirkpatrick, Lois M. <
> Thanks so much for the input, Robert, Robin and Ned!
> I have an article that I'd like to submit as a guest writer to PR/comm
> bloggers. I understand that the "spray and pray" approach is A Bad Thing,
> but I disagree with the advice to develop relationships with bloggers
> before pitching them. "Develop relationships" with 200 bloggers? There are
> not enough years in a lifetime!
> Yes, I definitely need to skim a blog before pitching, but it would be
> strange to put a pitch in a comment if I can't find their contact info.
> Lois Kirkpatrick, Manager
> Marketing & Strategic Analysis
> Office for Children
> Fairfax County Dept. of Family Services
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
r o b i n m. c a l d w e l l
cleveland | new york | wherever
Twitter: @thejstandard <http://twitter.com/thejstandard>
Blog: <http://mediatechpr.com/>MEdia | Tech | P.
Website: The J Standard Media Group <http://thejstandard.com>
*This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and
delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient
you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any
action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>