Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
Advanced Search
Author
Subject
Message
Special notice only

Advanced Search
  • On 21-02-13 20:07, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > [ ... ] (lot of patronising text removed) > 4. Therefore, you need multiple "smtpd" "pass" services for "postscreen" > to hand the connection to. The postscreen(8) manual page refers you to > > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_service_name > > which must specify the service name of a "pass" entry in master.cf, > you need one...
    Erik Slagter Feb 22, 2013
  • On 21-02-13 19:30, Noel Jones wrote: > You've shared too much. By now no one has any idea what you're doing. I'm just following the "REPORT A PROBLEM" procedure I was kindly pointed at... > When postscreen decides to pass the connection to smtpd, postscreen > is no longer involved, and smtpd has no knowledge of what transpired > between postscreen and a client. Yes at this point...
    Erik Slagter Feb 21, 2013
  • On 21-02-13 19:17, DTNX Postmaster wrote: > You keep blaming the documentation and the software, when the problem > is most likely in your understanding of it. Yes I blame the documentation, but not the software. I've been using postfix for, well, something like ten years or more, I think it's the best thing since sliced bread, especially compared to sendmail, qmail and exchange...
    Erik Slagter Feb 21, 2013
  • Fetching Sponsored Content...
  • On 21-02-13 16:45, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 21.02.2013 16:35, schrieb Erik Slagter: > >> mx1.ipv4.slagter.name:smtp inet n - n - 2 smtpd >> [ ... ] > and how should this be supposed to use postscreen...
    Erik Slagter Feb 21, 2013
  • Another variation I tried ("pass" and "postscreen" the other way around). This works, but gives the original problem, the smtpd options are not honoured (especially banner and starttls="may"), even though I set both: -o smtpd_tls_security_level=may -o postscreen_tls_security_level=may Output of postfinger, diff to first non-postscreen config: --- a 2013-02-21 17:35:41.568369098...
    Erik Slagter Feb 21, 2013
  • If I set up postscreen as closely as possible to the postscreen README document, I get this (diff to previous message) (I'm sorry lots of it has been folded). The log says "address already in use for 10.1.1.1", this is interesting because none of the changes involved 10.1.1.1. --- a 2013-02-21 16:37:18.348109048 +0100 +++ b 2013-02-21 17:25:24.337265305 +0100 @ -8,7 +8,7...
    Erik Slagter Feb 21, 2013
  • On 21-02-13 16:16, Wietse Venema wrote: > Erik Slagter: > TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail > TO (UN)SUBSCRIBE see http://www.postfix.org...
    Erik Slagter Feb 21, 2013
  • On 21-02-13 15:50, Wietse Venema wrote: > Erik Slagter: >> I tried another variant: >> >> 192.168.0.1:smtp inet ... postscreen >> -o options... >> >> 192.168.0.1:pass inet...
    Erik Slagter Feb 21, 2013
  • On 21-02-13 15:29, DTNX Postmaster wrote: >> See above, SMTP welcome string. Which I added as an option to both the >> smtpd and the postscreen line... None of them were honoured. > > Postscreen has its own set of options. Read the documentation; > http://www.postfix.org/postscreen.8.html man postscreen. The postscreen (and fwiw tslproxy) has it's own set of options which are... by...
    Erik Slagter Feb 21, 2013
  • On 21-02-13 13:04, DTNX Postmaster wrote: >> Please help me with the following. I have here a postfix system that >> listens on multiple (external) interfaces, e.g. one of them receives >> e-mail from the internet, one of them receives more or less secure mail >> from associated institutions. >> >> E-mail received on the "internet" interface receives full processing, >> including...
    Erik Slagter Feb 21, 2013