Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
Advanced Search
Author
Subject
Message
Special notice only

614 results from messages in postfix-users

Advanced Search
  • ...7/1/2013 11:16 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: > On 07/01/2013 08:15 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: >> On 07/01/2013 08:09 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: >>> On 6/28/2013 4:34 PM, Noel Jones wrote: >>>> On 6/28/2013 5:39 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote...that add a Subject header for every header that isn't > Subject ? > > Yes it does! Not quite what I'm looking for... -- Daniel
    Daniel L. Miller Jul 1, 2013
  • On 6/28/2013 4:34 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > On 6/28/2013 5:39 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: >> Does anyone know of a tool that will let me modify the subject line >> of all emails that pass through it? I would call it...SOMETHING in the subject otherwise it doesn't happen with this matching rule. Is it possible to ADD a Subject: header when none is present? -- Daniel
    Daniel L. Miller Jul 1, 2013
  • Does anyone know of a tool that will let me modify the subject line of all emails that pass through it? I would call it via a transport map. My application - we just switched to a new email-to-fax service. As part of their security implementation (THEIRS, not mine!) they require all emails sent to them to contain our own fax number. I want to automate this step so I don't have to hear from my users. -- Daniel
    Daniel L. Miller Jun 28, 2013
  • Fetching Sponsored Content...
  • ...something? Is there a way to control the order in which regular expressions are tested without using conditionals? Thanks very much, Daniel Flaum
    Daniel Flaum Apr 19, 2013
  • ...Harald wrote: > > Am 06.02.2013 23:02, schrieb Reindl Harald: >> >> Am 06.02.2013 22:57, schrieb Daniel L. Miller: >> >>> Otherwise when they send a message to "usre@^$1", the client hands it off...laugh!). Having the standard store-and-forward-with-retry operation results in calls like, "Daniel, I sent the message 20 minutes ago but Barbara still didn't get it. Why are the computers broken...
    Daniel L. Miller Feb 6, 2013
  • On 2/6/2013 1:53 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Daniel L. Miller: >>> reject_unverified_recipient will stop as soon as it has a reply >>> from the SMTP server (or from the local verify cache). >>> >>> If that...the user thinks the message actually sent when in reality they will get a rejection message some time later. And for my technology-challenged users... -- Daniel
    Daniel L. Miller Feb 6, 2013
  • On 2/6/2013 1:37 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Daniel L. Miller: >>>> I've been using recipient verification for some time with good >>>> results but I think I need to make an adjustment to accommodate the...reject_unverified_recipient will not wait for a few seconds. > Thank you. Is there an adjustment that will? Or is the manual client step my only option? -- Daniel
    Daniel L. Miller Feb 6, 2013
  • On 2/6/2013 12:39 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > On 2/6/2013 2:26 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: >> I've been using recipient verification for some time with good >> results but I think I need to make an adjustment to accommodate...tune it - my first guesses involve "address_verify_poll_count" and "address_verify_poll_delay" but I don't want to make adjustments blindly. -- Daniel
    Daniel L. Miller Feb 6, 2013
  • ...make an initial attempt, not wait longer than 2 seconds for a response, and then make another perhaps 5 or 10 seconds later? -- Daniel
    Daniel L. Miller Feb 6, 2013
  • On szo, jan 12, 2013 at 18:07:56 +0100, Tom Hendrikx wrote: > On 12-01-13 17:39, LEVAI Daniel wrote: > > On szo, jan 12, 2013 at 14:11:12 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > >> On Sat, Jan 12...depending on the input string (being an IP address or a hostname). Thanks for the clue-bats! Daniel -- LÉVAI Dániel PGP key ID = 0x83B63A8F Key fingerprint = DBEC C66B A47A DFA2 792D 650C C69B...
    LEVAI Daniel Jan 13, 2013