Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

550 Action not taken

Expand Messages
  • Ravindra Gupta // Viva
    Hello, we have configured postfix in one of our Centos server. [root@test ~]# postconf -d | grep mail_version mail_version = 2.10.0 milter_macro_v = $mail_name
    Message 1 of 7 , Jun 13, 2013
    • 0 Attachment
      Hello,

      we have configured postfix in one of our Centos server.

      [root@test ~]# postconf -d | grep mail_version
      mail_version = 2.10.0
      milter_macro_v = $mail_name $mail_version

       When we have sent one message in our mail id  we got below error code in maillog.


      Jun 12 20:29:23 ems31 postfix/smtpd[1813]: warning: dict_nis_init: NIS domain name not set - NIS lookups disabled
      Jun 12 20:29:23 ems31 postfix/smtpd[1813]: connect from eemail.example.com[10.0.0.25]
      Jun 12 20:29:24 ems31 postfix/smtpd[1813]: C582022400C: client=eemail.example.com[10.0.0.25]
      Jun 12 20:29:25 ems31 postfix/cleanup[1815]: C582022400C: message-id=<>
      Jun 12 20:29:25 ems31 postfix/qmgr[1798]: C582022400C: from=<test.example.com>, size=849, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
      Jun 12 20:29:26 ems31 postfix/smtpd[1813]: disconnect from eemail.example.com[10.0.0.25]
      Jun 12 20:29:26 ems31 postfix/smtp[1816]: C582022400C: to=<ravindragupta_123@...>, relay=mta5.am0.yahoodns.net[98.138.112.38]:25, delay=2.4, delays=1.3/0.01/0.69/0.41, dsn=5.0.0, status=bounced (host mta5.am0.yahoodns.net[98.138.112.38] said: 550 Action not taken (in reply to end of DATA command))
      Jun 12 20:29:26 ems31 postfix/cleanup[1815]: CC78D22400E: message-id=<20130613002926.CC78D22400E@...>
      Jun 12 20:29:26 ems31 postfix/bounce[1817]: C582022400C: sender non-delivery notification: CC78D22400E
      Jun 12 20:29:26 ems31 postfix/qmgr[1798]: C582022400C: removed
      Jun 12 20:29:26 ems31 postfix/qmgr[1798]: CC78D22400E: from=<>, size=2817, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
      Jun 12 20:29:27 ems31 postfix/smtp[1816]: CC78D22400E: to=<test.example.com>, relay=imap.eemail.example.com[10.0.0.125]:25, delay=0.86, delays=0.01/0/0.42/0.42, dsn=5.0.0, status=bounced (host imap.eemail.example.com[10.0.0.125] said: 550 Action not taken (in reply to end of DATA command))
      Jun 12 20:29:27 ems31 postfix/qmgr[1798]: CC78D22400E: removed
      Jun 12 20:30:40 ems31 postfix/smtpd[1802]: timeout after END-OF-MESSAGE from unknown[10.0.0.158]
      Jun 12 20:30:40 ems31 postfix/smtpd[1802]: disconnect from unknown[10.0.0.158]


      Can anyone help or suggest how to start troubleshooting? 


    • Wietse Venema
      ... Are your SMTP connections intercepted by an anti-virus system? Wietse
      Message 2 of 7 , Jun 13, 2013
      • 0 Attachment
        Ravindra Gupta // Viva:
        > Jun 12 20:29:27 ems31 postfix/smtp[1816]: CC78D22400E: to=<test.example.com>,
        > relay=imap.eemail.example.com[10.0.0.125]:25, delay=0.86,
        > delays=0.01/0/0.42/0.42, dsn=5.0.0, status=bounced (host
        > imap.eemail.example.com[10.0.0.125] said: 550 Action not taken (in reply to
        > end of DATA command))

        Are your SMTP connections intercepted by an anti-virus system?

        Wietse
      • Ravindra Gupta // Viva
        Dear Wietse, So how we will resolve the issue. Please let me know for your valuable suggestion.
        Message 3 of 7 , Jun 13, 2013
        • 0 Attachment
          Dear Wietse,

          So how we will resolve the issue. Please let me know for your valuable suggestion.





          On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:26 AM, Wietse Venema <wietse@...> wrote:
          Ravindra Gupta // Viva:
          > Jun 12 20:29:27 ems31 postfix/smtp[1816]: CC78D22400E: to=<test.example.com>,
          > relay=imap.eemail.example.com[10.0.0.125]:25, delay=0.86,
          > delays=0.01/0/0.42/0.42, dsn=5.0.0, status=bounced (host
          > imap.eemail.example.com[10.0.0.125] said: 550 Action not taken (in reply to
          > end of DATA command))

          Are your SMTP connections intercepted by an anti-virus system?

                  Wietse

        • Jeroen Geilman
          ... As your log clearly shows, the OTHER SIDE of the SMTP conversation tells you this. If this other side is a receiving SMTP *server*, then they are rejecting
          Message 4 of 7 , Jun 13, 2013
          • 0 Attachment
            On 06/13/2013 09:02 PM, Ravindra Gupta // Viva wrote:
            Dear Wietse,

            So how we will resolve the issue. Please let me know for your valuable suggestion.


            As your log clearly shows, the OTHER SIDE of the SMTP conversation tells you this.
            If this other side is a receiving SMTP *server*, then they are rejecting your message.

            If, as Wietse suggested, the other side is a virus/spam gateway on YOUR side, then this gateway is broken or misconfigured in some way (since it should probably not reject your own messages.)

            Regardless, it is a proper 5xx response, telling postfix to bounce the message.

            Only the OTHER SIDE can shed ligt on whether or not this was in error, or in fact the desired outcome.





            On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:26 AM, Wietse Venema <wietse@...> wrote:
            Ravindra Gupta // Viva:
            > Jun 12 20:29:27 ems31 postfix/smtp[1816]: CC78D22400E: to=<test.example.com>,
            > relay=imap.eemail.example.com[10.0.0.125]:25, delay=0.86,
            > delays=0.01/0/0.42/0.42, dsn=5.0.0, status=bounced (host
            > imap.eemail.example.com[10.0.0.125] said: 550 Action not taken (in reply to
            > end of DATA command))

            Are your SMTP connections intercepted by an anti-virus system?

                    Wietse



            -- 
            J.
            
          • Wietse Venema
            ... With this I meant an anti-virus system near your Postfix mail system that is blocking mail. Presumably, you are in a better position than me to find out
            Message 5 of 7 , Jun 13, 2013
            • 0 Attachment
              Ravindra Gupta // Viva:
              > Jun 12 20:29:27 ems31 postfix/smtp[1816]: CC78D22400E:
              > to=<test.example.com>, relay=imap.eemail.example.com[10.0.0.125]:25,
              > delay=0.86, delays=0.01/0/0.42/0.42, dsn=5.0.0, status=bounced (host
              > imap.eemail.example.com[10.0.0.125] said: 550 Action not taken (in
              > reply to end of DATA command))

              Wietse:
              > Are your SMTP connections intercepted by an anti-virus system?

              With this I meant an anti-virus system near your Postfix mail system
              that is blocking mail. Presumably, you are in a better position
              than me to find out if that is the case.

              If the mail is rejected by or near the receiving mail server, then
              that is no longer a question about Postfix. Instead the question
              is about why they reject your mail.

              Wietse
            • Benny Pedersen
              ... http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html#Recipient address verification frontend accept and bounce problems -- senders that put my email
              Message 6 of 7 , Jun 14, 2013
              • 0 Attachment
                Ravindra Gupta // Viva skrev den 2013-06-13 21:02:

                > So how we will resolve the issue. Please let me know for your
                > valuable suggestion.

                http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html#Recipient
                address verification

                frontend accept and bounce problems

                --
                senders that put my email into body content will deliver it to my own
                trashcan, so if you like to get reply, dont do it
              • Benny Pedersen
                ... reject is only good if content filter is before queue is it dovecot reject ? (vacation reject or quotas?) ... after queue filters and reject is not the
                Message 7 of 7 , Jun 14, 2013
                • 0 Attachment
                  wietse@... skrev den 2013-06-13 21:32:
                  > Ravindra Gupta // Viva:
                  >> Jun 12 20:29:27 ems31 postfix/smtp[1816]: CC78D22400E:
                  >> to=<test.example.com>, relay=imap.eemail.example.com[10.0.0.125]:25,
                  >> delay=0.86, delays=0.01/0/0.42/0.42, dsn=5.0.0, status=bounced (host
                  >> imap.eemail.example.com[10.0.0.125] said: 550 Action not taken (in
                  >> reply to end of DATA command))

                  reject is only good if content filter is before queue

                  is it dovecot reject ? (vacation reject or quotas?)

                  > Wietse:
                  >> Are your SMTP connections intercepted by an anti-virus system?
                  >
                  > With this I meant an anti-virus system near your Postfix mail system
                  > that is blocking mail. Presumably, you are in a better position
                  > than me to find out if that is the case.
                  >
                  > If the mail is rejected by or near the receiving mail server, then
                  > that is no longer a question about Postfix. Instead the question
                  > is about why they reject your mail.

                  after queue filters and reject is not the solution

                  --
                  senders that put my email into body content will deliver it to my own
                  trashcan, so if you like to get reply, dont do it
                Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.