Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
Skip to search.
 

Re: 454 instead 5xx status for "Relay access denied"

Expand Messages
  • Reindl Harald
    ... uhm as i said: * the machine is not MX for any single domain * the machine must not accept any unauthenticated message * and so any aerror is NOT tenporary
    Message 1 of 10 , Apr 29, 2013
      Am 29.04.2013 06:10, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
      > On 4/28/2013 7:33 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
      >> There is an important difference, which is why the defer variant
      >> is used as a safety net, and the use-case is precisely when the
      >> client is an MTA.
      >
      > Apparently I didn't make my point clear, which is that a hard fail isn't
      > necessary here, and that a temp fail is preferable to cover all client
      > types. I think Reindl was advocating a hard fail. I was countering his
      > argument

      uhm as i said:

      * the machine is not MX for any single domain
      * the machine must not accept any unauthenticated message
      * and so any aerror is NOT tenporary until smtp auth is used
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.