Re: 454 instead 5xx status for "Relay access denied"
- Am 29.04.2013 06:10, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
> On 4/28/2013 7:33 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:uhm as i said:
>> There is an important difference, which is why the defer variant
>> is used as a safety net, and the use-case is precisely when the
>> client is an MTA.
> Apparently I didn't make my point clear, which is that a hard fail isn't
> necessary here, and that a temp fail is preferable to cover all client
> types. I think Reindl was advocating a hard fail. I was countering his
* the machine is not MX for any single domain
* the machine must not accept any unauthenticated message
* and so any aerror is NOT tenporary until smtp auth is used