- May be we can put that into the Postfix documentation page, in Specific environments section. Also, may be DNS can be there, both are environmentsMessage 1 of 16 , Mar 3 1:50 PMView SourceMay be we can put that into the Postfix documentation page, in "Specific environments" section. Also, may be DNS can be there, both are "environments" anyway...Just 2 cents...Best regards,
---Fernando Maciel Souto MaiorOn Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 6:17 PM, /dev/rob0 <rob0@...> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 04:59:37PM +0000, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> I see negligible benefit from an SNI implementation for Postfix.
> Is it time to add an anti-SNI rationale section to TLS_README? This
> would set a bad precedent, there is no limit to the number of
> non-features we could document.
Rather than putting it in TLS_README, I think a FAQ would be more
fitting. I know we used to have a FAQ document, but it has long ago
been abandoned. We get a lot of the same questions here, and some
ardent Googlers still stumble upon the old faq.html page.
Perhaps rather than a DNS_README as you suggested in another thread,
that could be worked into a FAQ? I agree, DNS is a vital subject to
most MTA administrators, but here too it's not going to cover actual
Postfix features, for the most part.
http://rob0.nodns4.us/ -- system administration and consulting
Offlist GMX mail is seen only if "/dev/rob0" is in the Subject: