Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

dict_memcache_sequence log entries in 2.9-20120108

Expand Messages
  • Noel Jones
    I notice after installing postfix-2.9-20120108 I get thousands of log entries such as (valid username redacted) Jan 10 16:54:09 mgate3 postfix/verify[57527]:
    Message 1 of 3 , Jan 10, 2012
    • 0 Attachment
      I notice after installing postfix-2.9-20120108 I get thousands of
      log entries such as (valid username redacted)

      Jan 10 16:54:09 mgate3 postfix/verify[57527]:
      dict_memcache_sequence: /etc/postfix/maps/memcache_verify.cf: key
      "user@..." => 0:0:1325186726:250 ok its for <user@...>

      and

      Jan 10 14:58:46 mgate3 postfix/postscreen[33675]:
      dict_memcache_sequence:
      /etc/postfix/maps/memcache_postscreen_cache.cf: key "98.139.91.98"
      => 1325955071;1325872271;1;1;1;0


      I didn't get these with the previous snapshot. Did I screw
      something up or are these just left-over development messages?



      -- Noel Jones
    • Wietse Venema
      ... There s a missing if (msg_verbose) before line 466. I didn t notice this because cache scans happen only a few times a day. Wietse 464 } else { 465
      Message 2 of 3 , Jan 10, 2012
      • 0 Attachment
        Noel Jones:
        > I notice after installing postfix-2.9-20120108 I get thousands of
        > log entries such as (valid username redacted)
        >
        > Jan 10 16:54:09 mgate3 postfix/verify[57527]:
        > dict_memcache_sequence: /etc/postfix/maps/memcache_verify.cf: key
        > "user@..." => 0:0:1325186726:250 ok its for <user@...>
        >
        > and
        >
        > Jan 10 14:58:46 mgate3 postfix/postscreen[33675]:
        > dict_memcache_sequence:
        > /etc/postfix/maps/memcache_postscreen_cache.cf: key "98.139.91.98"
        > => 1325955071;1325872271;1;1;1;0
        >
        >
        > I didn't get these with the previous snapshot. Did I screw
        > something up or are these just left-over development messages?

        There's a missing "if (msg_verbose)" before line 466. I didn't notice
        this because cache scans happen only a few times a day.

        Wietse

        464 } else {
        465 seq_res = backup->sequence(backup, function, key, value);
        466 msg_info("%s: %s: key \"%s\" => %s",
        467 myname, dict_mc->dict.name, *key ? *key : "(not found)",
        468 *value ? *value : backup->error ? "(backup error)" :
        469 "(not found)");
        470 DICT_ERR_VAL_RETURN(dict, backup->error, seq_res);
        471 }
      • Noel Jones
        Confirm fixed in the 20120110 snapshot. Thanks! -- Noel Jones
        Message 3 of 3 , Jan 11, 2012
        • 0 Attachment
          Confirm fixed in the 20120110 snapshot.

          Thanks!


          -- Noel Jones




          On 1/10/2012 6:05 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
          > Noel Jones:
          >> I notice after installing postfix-2.9-20120108 I get thousands of
          >> log entries such as (valid username redacted)
          >>
          >> Jan 10 16:54:09 mgate3 postfix/verify[57527]:
          >> dict_memcache_sequence: /etc/postfix/maps/memcache_verify.cf: key
          >> "user@..." => 0:0:1325186726:250 ok its for <user@...>
          >>
          >> and
          >>
          >> Jan 10 14:58:46 mgate3 postfix/postscreen[33675]:
          >> dict_memcache_sequence:
          >> /etc/postfix/maps/memcache_postscreen_cache.cf: key "98.139.91.98"
          >> => 1325955071;1325872271;1;1;1;0
          >>
          >>
          >> I didn't get these with the previous snapshot. Did I screw
          >> something up or are these just left-over development messages?
          >
          > There's a missing "if (msg_verbose)" before line 466. I didn't notice
          > this because cache scans happen only a few times a day.
          >
          > Wietse
          >
          > 464 } else {
          > 465 seq_res = backup->sequence(backup, function, key, value);
          > 466 msg_info("%s: %s: key \"%s\" => %s",
          > 467 myname, dict_mc->dict.name, *key ? *key : "(not found)",
          > 468 *value ? *value : backup->error ? "(backup error)" :
          > 469 "(not found)");
          > 470 DICT_ERR_VAL_RETURN(dict, backup->error, seq_res);
          > 471 }
          >
        Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.