Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

antyspam.onet.pl

Expand Messages
  • Reindl Harald
    has anybody out there ever sent a message to them successfull? they are blcoking all our servers independent from the network-range including messages to
    Message 1 of 6 , May 2, 2011
    • 0 Attachment
      has anybody out there ever sent a message to them successfull?

      they are blcoking all our servers independent from the network-range
      including messages to postmaster and FAIK it is rfc-ignorant answer
      with 451 the whole time for all messages until "maximal_queue_lifetime"
      is reached

      May 1 22:12:19 arrakis postfix/qmgr[6635]: 5A20E36034: from=<client-sender>, size=14899, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
      May 1 22:12:19 arrakis postfix/smtp[6720]: 5A20E36034: to=<latkowska@...>,
      relay=mx.poczta.onet.pl[213.180.147.146]:25, delay=0.46, delays=0.11/0.03/0.22/0.09, dsn=4.7.1, status=deferred
      (host mx.poczta.onet.pl[213.180.147.146] said: 451 4.7.1 Wiadomosc zostala odrzucona przez system antyspamowy /
      Message has been refused by antispam (http://antyspam.onet.pl/odblokuj.html?id=01002P0F015&ip=91.118.73.6) (in
      reply to MAIL FROM command))
      May 1 22:30:57 arrakis postfix/qmgr[6635]: 5A20E36034: from=<client-sender>, size=14899, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
      May 1 22:30:57 arrakis postfix/smtp[7224]: 5A20E36034: to=<latkowska@...>,
      relay=mx.poczta.onet.pl[213.180.147.146]:25, delay=1118, delays=1118/0.05/0.31/0.05, dsn=4.7.1, status=deferred
      (host mx.poczta.onet.pl[213.180.147.146] said: 451 4.7.1 Wiadomosc zostala odrzucona przez system antyspamowy /
      Message has been refused by antispam (http://antyspam.onet.pl/odblokuj.html?id=01002P0F018&ip=91.118.73.6) (in
      reply to MAIL FROM command))
      May 1 22:50:57 arrakis postfix/qmgr[6635]: 5A20E36034: from=<client-sender>, size=14899, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
      May 1 22:50:58 arrakis postfix/smtp[7515]: 5A20E36034: to=<latkowska@...>,
      relay=mx.poczta.onet.pl[213.180.147.146]:25, delay=2319, delays=2318/0.05/1.1/0.06, dsn=4.7.1, status=deferred
      (host mx.poczta.onet.pl[213.180.147.146] said: 451 4.7.1 Wiadomosc zostala odrzucona przez system antyspamowy /
      Message has been refused by antispam (http://antyspam.onet.pl/odblokuj.html?id=01002P0F014&ip=91.118.73.6) (in
      reply to MAIL FROM command))
      May 1 23:30:57 arrakis postfix/qmgr[6635]: 5A20E36034: from=<client-sender>, size=14899, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
      May 1 23:30:57 arrakis postfix/smtp[9057]: 5A20E36034: to=<latkowska@...>,
      relay=mx.poczta.onet.pl[213.180.147.146]:25, delay=4718, delays=4718/0.04/0.22/0.05, dsn=4.7.1, status=deferred
      (host mx.poczta.onet.pl[213.180.147.146] said: 451 4.7.1 Wiadomosc zostala odrzucona przez system antyspamowy /
      Message has been refused by antispam (http://antyspam.onet.pl/odblokuj.html?id=01002P0F007&ip=91.118.73.6) (in
      reply to MAIL FROM command))
      May 2 00:50:59 arrakis postfix/qmgr[6635]: 5A20E36034: from=<client-sender>, size=14899, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
      May 2 00:51:00 arrakis postfix/smtp[12104]: 5A20E36034: to=<latkowska@...>,
      relay=mx.poczta.onet.pl[213.180.147.146]:25, delay=9521, delays=9520/0.07/0.17/0.24, dsn=4.7.1, status=deferred
      (host mx.poczta.onet.pl[213.180.147.146] said: 451 4.7.1 Wiadomosc zostala odrzucona przez system antyspamowy /
      Message has been refused by antispam (http://antyspam.onet.pl/odblokuj.html?id=01002P0F010&ip=91.118.73.6) (in
      reply to MAIL FROM command))
      May 2 02:22:59 arrakis postfix/qmgr[6635]: 5A20E36034: from=<client-sender>, size=14899, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
      May 2 02:23:00 arrakis postfix/smtp[10167]: 5A20E36034: to=<latkowska@...>,
      relay=mx.poczta.onet.pl[213.180.147.146]:25, delay=15041, delays=15041/0.04/0.19/0.14, dsn=4.7.1, status=deferred
      (host mx.poczta.onet.pl[213.180.147.146] said: 451 4.7.1 Wiadomosc zostala odrzucona przez system antyspamowy /
      Message has been refused by antispam (http://antyspam.onet.pl/odblokuj.html?id=01002P0F007&ip=91.118.73.6) (in
      reply to MAIL FROM command))
      May 2 03:54:59 arrakis postfix/qmgr[6635]: 5A20E36034: from=<client-sender>, size=14899, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
      May 2 03:55:00 arrakis postfix/smtp[13109]: 5A20E36034: to=<latkowska@...>,
      relay=mx.poczta.onet.pl[213.180.147.146]:25, delay=20561, delays=20561/0.08/0.26/0.05, dsn=4.7.1, status=deferred
      (host mx.poczta.onet.pl[213.180.147.146] said: 451 4.7.1 Wiadomosc zostala odrzucona przez system antyspamowy /
      Message has been refused by antispam (http://antyspam.onet.pl/odblokuj.html?id=01002P0F009&ip=91.118.73.6) (in
      reply to MAIL FROM command))
      May 2 05:26:59 arrakis postfix/qmgr[6635]: 5A20E36034: from=<client-sender>, size=14899, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
      May 2 05:27:00 arrakis postfix/smtp[16056]: 5A20E36034: to=<latkowska@...>,
      relay=mx.poczta.onet.pl[213.180.147.146]:25, delay=26081, delays=26080/0.04/1/0.14, dsn=4.7.1, status=deferred
      (host mx.poczta.onet.pl[213.180.147.146] said: 451 4.7.1 Wiadomosc zostala odrzucona przez system antyspamowy /
      Message has been refused by antispam (http://antyspam.onet.pl/odblokuj.html?id=01002P0F016&ip=91.118.73.6) (in
      reply to MAIL FROM command))
      May 2 06:58:59 arrakis postfix/qmgr[6635]: 5A20E36034: from=<client-sender>, size=14899, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
      May 2 06:59:00 arrakis postfix/smtp[18282]: 5A20E36034: to=<latkowska@...>,
      relay=mx.poczta.onet.pl[213.180.147.146]:25, delay=31601, delays=31601/0.08/0.14/0.13, dsn=4.7.1, status=deferred
      (host mx.poczta.onet.pl[213.180.147.146] said: 451 4.7.1 Wiadomosc zostala odrzucona przez system antyspamowy /
      Message has been refused by antispam (http://antyspam.onet.pl/odblokuj.html?id=01002P0F007&ip=91.118.73.6) (in
      reply to MAIL FROM command))
      May 2 08:30:59 arrakis postfix/qmgr[6635]: 5A20E36034: from=<client-sender>, size=14899, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
      May 2 08:30:59 arrakis postfix/smtp[20775]: 5A20E36034: to=<latkowska@...>,
      relay=mx.poczta.onet.pl[213.180.147.146]:25, delay=37120, delays=37120/0.39/0.14/0.05, dsn=4.7.1, status=deferred
      (host mx.poczta.onet.pl[213.180.147.146] said: 451 4.7.1 Wiadomosc zostala odrzucona przez system antyspamowy /
      Message has been refused by antispam (http://antyspam.onet.pl/odblokuj.html?id=01002P0F008&ip=91.118.73.6) (in
      reply to MAIL FROM command))
      May 2 10:02:59 arrakis postfix/qmgr[6635]: 5A20E36034: from=<client-sender>, size=14899, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
      May 2 10:03:00 arrakis postfix/smtp[23162]: 5A20E36034: to=<latkowska@...>,
      relay=mx.poczta.onet.pl[213.180.147.146]:25, delay=42641, delays=42640/0.35/0.15/0.12, dsn=4.7.1, status=deferred
      (host mx.poczta.onet.pl[213.180.147.146] said: 451 4.7.1 Wiadomosc zostala odrzucona przez system antyspamowy /
      Message has been refused by antispam (http://antyspam.onet.pl/odblokuj.html?id=01002P0F015&ip=91.118.73.6) (in
      reply to MAIL FROM command))
      May 2 11:34:59 arrakis postfix/qmgr[6635]: 5A20E36034: from=<client-sender>, size=14899, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
      May 2 11:35:00 arrakis postfix/smtp[25724]: 5A20E36034: to=<latkowska@...>,
      relay=mx.poczta.onet.pl[213.180.147.146]:25, delay=48161, delays=48160/0.05/0.21/0.12, dsn=4.7.1, status=deferred
      (host mx.poczta.onet.pl[213.180.147.146] said: 451 4.7.1 Wiadomosc zostala odrzucona przez system antyspamowy /
      Message has been refused by antispam (http://antyspam.onet.pl/odblokuj.html?id=01002P0F009&ip=91.118.73.6) (in
      reply to MAIL FROM command))

      --

      Mit besten Grüßen, Reindl Harald
      the lounge interactive design GmbH
      A-1060 Vienna, Hofmühlgasse 17
      CTO / software-development / cms-solutions
      p: +43 (1) 595 3999 33, m: +43 (676) 40 221 40
      icq: 154546673, http://www.thelounge.net/

      http://www.thelounge.net/signature.asc.what.htm
    • Mihira Fernando
      ... [snip] ... Have you tried filling out that form they have given ? Mihira.
      Message 2 of 6 , May 2, 2011
      • 0 Attachment
        On 05/02/2011 03:31 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
        > has anybody out there ever sent a message to them successfull?
        >
        > they are blcoking all our servers independent from the network-range
        > including messages to postmaster and FAIK it is rfc-ignorant answer
        > with 451 the whole time for all messages until "maximal_queue_lifetime"
        > is reached
        [snip]

        > http://antyspam.onet.pl/odblokuj.html?id=01002P0F009&ip=91.118.73.6
        Have you tried filling out that form they have given ?


        Mihira.
      • Reindl Harald
        ... yes after google-translate what the want from me and from english to polish also with google-translate how stoopid can anybody be to make server-answers
        Message 3 of 6 , May 2, 2011
        • 0 Attachment
          Am 02.05.2011 12:37, schrieb Mihira Fernando:
          > On 05/02/2011 03:31 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
          >> has anybody out there ever sent a message to them successfull?
          >>
          >> they are blcoking all our servers independent from the network-range
          >> including messages to postmaster and FAIK it is rfc-ignorant answer
          >> with 451 the whole time for all messages until "maximal_queue_lifetime"
          >> is reached
          > [snip]
          >
          >> http://antyspam.onet.pl/odblokuj.html?id=01002P0F009&ip=91.118.73.6
          > Have you tried filling out that form they have given?

          yes after google-translate what the want from me and from
          english to polish also with google-translate

          how stoopid can anybody be to make server-answers form a spamfilter
          with 451 in polish and a form nobody out there can read followed
          by a RED SUCCESS MESSAGE (finding out success after google translate again)
        • Mihira Fernando
          ... They are most likely to be catering only to Poland. I ve seen Russian servers doing the same thing.
          Message 4 of 6 , May 2, 2011
          • 0 Attachment
            On 05/02/2011 04:17 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
            >
            > Am 02.05.2011 12:37, schrieb Mihira Fernando:
            >> On 05/02/2011 03:31 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
            >>> has anybody out there ever sent a message to them successfull?
            >>>
            >>> they are blcoking all our servers independent from the network-range
            >>> including messages to postmaster and FAIK it is rfc-ignorant answer
            >>> with 451 the whole time for all messages until "maximal_queue_lifetime"
            >>> is reached
            >> [snip]
            >>
            >>> http://antyspam.onet.pl/odblokuj.html?id=01002P0F009&ip=91.118.73.6
            >> Have you tried filling out that form they have given?
            > yes after google-translate what the want from me and from
            > english to polish also with google-translate
            >
            > how stoopid can anybody be to make server-answers form a spamfilter
            > with 451 in polish and a form nobody out there can read followed
            > by a RED SUCCESS MESSAGE (finding out success after google translate again)
            >
            They are most likely to be catering only to Poland. I've seen Russian
            servers doing the same thing.
          • Reindl Harald
            ... so this f****g id***s should answer with 550 instead 451 and tell their users that they can not use their address for fill out webforms or use them as
            Message 5 of 6 , May 2, 2011
            • 0 Attachment
              Am 02.05.2011 12:49, schrieb Mihira Fernando:

              >> how stoopid can anybody be to make server-answers form a spamfilter
              >> with 451 in polish and a form nobody out there can read followed
              >> by a RED SUCCESS MESSAGE (finding out success after google translate again)
              >>
              > They are most likely to be catering only to Poland.
              > I've seen Russian servers doing the same thing

              so this f****g id***s should answer with 550 instead 451 and tell their
              users that they can not use their address for fill out webforms or
              use them as forwarder-target for international domains :-(
            • Dominik Schulz
              ... Yeah, onet is no fun. Always trouble with this host ... -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Dominik vboxadm.net - Postfix admin Interface
              Message 6 of 6 , May 3, 2011
              • 0 Attachment
                Am Montag, 2. Mai 2011, 12:57:01 schrieb Reindl Harald:
                > Am 02.05.2011 12:49, schrieb Mihira Fernando:
                > >> how stoopid can anybody be to make server-answers form a spamfilter
                > >> with 451 in polish and a form nobody out there can read followed
                > >> by a RED SUCCESS MESSAGE (finding out success after google translate
                > >> again)
                > >
                > > They are most likely to be catering only to Poland.
                > > I've seen Russian servers doing the same thing
                >
                > so this f****g id***s should answer with 550 instead 451 and tell their
                > users that they can not use their address for fill out webforms or
                > use them as forwarder-target for international domains :-(

                Yeah, onet is no fun. Always trouble with this host ...
                --
                Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards
                Dominik

                vboxadm.net - Postfix admin Interface
              Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.