Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Submission on an additional port

Expand Messages
  • Charles Marcus
    ... Crap... yeah, thats a good reason. I haven t run into that, but I wouldn t call myself a road warrior either. I understand and agree with public networks
    Message 1 of 4 , Sep 29, 2010
    • 0 Attachment
      On 2010-09-29 12:09 AM, Neil wrote:
      > Oh, I definitely do use 587/submission right now (as you might've
      > deduced from above). The reason I want 785 is because I recently find
      > myself visiting a network quite regularly where 25, 465, 587 are all
      > blocked (don't ask me why; doesn't make much sense to me).

      Crap... yeah, thats a good reason. I haven't run into that, but I
      wouldn't call myself a road warrior either. I understand and agree with
      public networks that block outbound port 25, but they shouldn't be
      blocking 587...

      --

      Best regards,

      Charles
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.