Re: [OT] suitable webmail
- On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:17:49 -0500, Charles Marcus
> On 2010-02-01 4:05 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:attention
>> My Roundcube package is currently up to date, and it is a standard
>> Debian package:
>> [02:21:52][root@greer]/$ aptitude show roundcube
>> Package: roundcube
>> New: yes
>> State: installed
>> Automatically installed: no
>> Version: 0.2.2-1~bpo50+1
> Eh? 0.3.1 is the current version, so how is 0.2.2 'up to date'?
0.3.1 is the current version , so 0.2.2 is 'up to date'
- LuKreme put forth on 2/12/2010 10:08 AM:
> On 12-Feb-2010, at 08:48, Stan Hoeppner wrote:If you'd have read past the first line you'd have noticed I said the same thing. ;)
>> Tell me about this "top-secure" aspect of Squirrelmail again. ;)
> The fact that some spammers are able to get into email accounts and send spam via squirrelmail has nothing to do with the security of squirrelmail itself. In nerely all, if not all, of these cases the account is being compromised due to having a password like "password1" or "12345678"