Re: BackScatter Problem
- On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 7:31 AM, kj
> jan gestre wrote:Hi KJ,
>> Received: from 55.Red-88-7-191.staticIP.rima-tde.net
>> (55.Red-88-7-191.staticIP.rima-tde.net [184.108.40.206])
>> by mail.example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DEC4148041
>> for <jmgarcia@...>; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 08:58:53 +0800 (PHT)
>> From: "Jeanine" <jmgarcia@...>
>> To: jmgarcia@...
>> Subject: Check it now
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 08:58:53 +0800 (PHT)
>> The received from ip address is obviously not the company's real ip
>> address, and we have lots of emails like this.
> This is just ordinary spam, not backscatter. If it was backscatter, there
> would be trace of a server having bounced it.
> The above was sent from an IP that doesn't accept mail, and judging by that
> PTR, it's not a real mail server anyway. If you were using Spamhaus, it
> would have been rejected too - it's in PBL and XBL.
That's the funny thing, I'm using sbl-xbl spamhaus as well as
spamcop.net but it wasn't blocked, I've now changed it to zen, I'm not
sure though if it would have any effect.
- On Tue, 02 Jun 2009, jan gestre wrote:
> That's the funny thing, I'm using sbl-xbl spamhaus as well asThe IP is not listed on SBL and was only listed on CBL (ergo XBL) at
> spamcop.net but it wasn't blocked, I've now changed it to zen, I'm not
> sure though if it would have any effect.
2009-06-01 14:00 GMT; you received it before then. If you had been using
PBL (or better, Zen), then it might've been blocked.
Sahil Tandon <sahil@...>