Re: question on xforward
- Victor Duchovni schrieb:
>>> Is there any good reason why smtpd_tls_received_header does not includeHey - no offense, we're in the same business! This was just a serious
>>> the ccert_fingerprint when available?
>> Perhaps it is because software does not grow on trees and
>> actually needs to be created first?
question because I noticed that you (very experienced developers)
decided not to include that type of information and so I said to me
"should ask them, if there was a good reason for it that I (less
experienced developer) am not aware of".
> This is too much information to include by default. To make the ccertI see. Well, postfix has anything I need on board (prepend, policy
> available, the Received header annotations would have to be configurable.
> I am not sure this is a win.
delegation). I definately would prefer a solution without prepending a
header at data stage but now I am able to implement what I want. Thank
you for your help.