Re: my question for nested_header_checks
- Hi, Noel and Victor
Thank you very much for your precious informations.
I got it.
Maybe I just have to use body_checks against broken format..
--- postfix-users@... ---
>On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:12:08AM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
>> Anything else is just body text, even if it looks like a header.
>> Standard bounces come with the original headers as an attached
>> message; they can be examined by nested_header_checks. Some
>> bounces arrive with the original headers included in body
>> text; they must be examined by body_checks.
>> While including your anti-backscatter rules in body_checks
>> does increase the risk of false positives, IMO the increased
>> risk is very slight, and outweighed by the benefit of
>> detecting non-standard bounces.
>The limitation is that "body_checks" works one line at a time and cannot
>process folded headers in the message body. At this time there is no
>support in the Postfix MIME parser for treating "text/rfc822-headers"
>MIME parts as (nested) headers.
>Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
>Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
>To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
>http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
>If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
>send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
>"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.