Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Parameter question.

Expand Messages
  • Duane Hill
    ... Oops! After rereading the doc, I realize this now. Sorry for misleading.
    Message 1 of 4 , Feb 28, 2007
    • 0 Attachment
      On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Victor Duchovni wrote:

      > On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 04:30:03AM +0000, Duane Hill wrote:
      >
      >> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, Adam C. Mathews wrote:
      >>
      >>> reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname
      >>>
      >>> Am I understanding correctly that this looks for a reverse DNS entry for
      >>> a connecting IP, and if no such record exists it denies the mail?
      >>
      >> Correct.
      >>
      >>> This does NOT check that the reverse matches the forward entry correct
      >>> (i.e. it is a fairly conservative check)...
      >>
      >> No. However, it does enforce the fact there must be an A record for the
      >> host name returned from looking up the IP address. If not, the message
      >> will be rejected with a 450 code by default.
      >
      > No, it only checks that the reverse name exists, no forward lookup
      > is made.

      Oops! After rereading the doc, I realize this now. Sorry for misleading.
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.