Re: canonical user
- Magnus Bäck wrote:
> On Friday, December 29, 2006 at 10:22 CET,Hmm... I think its more complicated than i expected
> anwara <anwara@...> wrote:
> Why? Can't you just use masquerade_domains?
>Finally i have quick and dirty solution, i move fetchmail to another
> Yes, this is the expected behaviour when you use
> recipient_canonical_maps to rewrite admin@...
> to admin@.... Perhaps you should be using
> virtual aliasing instead? Virtual aliasing does not affect the message
> headers, and you will thus not have the described Reply All problem.
machine, than do smtp connection to postfix