Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Benefits to forcing remotes to use my SMTP?

Expand Messages
  • Victor Duchovni
    ... If submission is on port 25, and this why submission should be on port 587, ISPs should not be blocking that. If DKIM ever becomes the expected norm, a
    Message 1 of 3 , Dec 29, 2006
    • 0 Attachment
      On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 08:00:31PM +0100, mouss wrote:

      > Giving users the possibility to use your server for mail submission is a
      > service that you give them. This is sometimes helpful to avoid the need
      > to change the mail settings [...]
      >
      > On the other hand, some ISPs will block port 25 and thus force users to
      > relay through their servers.

      If submission is on port 25, and this why submission should be on
      port 587, ISPs should not be blocking that. If DKIM ever becomes the
      expected norm, a submission service will be desirable.

      --
      Viktor.

      Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
      Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.

      To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
      http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
      <mailto:majordomo@...?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>

      If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
      send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
      "It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.