Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: RBL question and their performance stats for me

Expand Messages
  • Victor Duchovni
    ... # # SpamHaus SBL # reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.2 # # SpamHaus XBL, CBL portion # reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.4 # # SpamHaus
    Message 1 of 21 , Dec 1, 2006
    • 0 Attachment
      On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 08:55:22AM +0100, Erwan David wrote:

      > > They have not launched a marketing campaign telling everyone to switch,
      > > but they have on various fora said that zen is ready and live, and that
      > > there is no reason to not switch from sbl-xbl to zen.
      >
      > Except if you do not want to filter what PBL filters.

      #
      # SpamHaus SBL
      #
      reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.2
      #
      # SpamHaus XBL, CBL portion
      #
      reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.4
      #
      # SpamHaus XBL, NJABL portion
      #
      reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.5
      #
      # SpamHaus PBL
      #
      reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.10
      reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.11

      These five restrictions cost only one DNS lookup, and one can decide which
      of the five to use (order not significant). I don't know definitively
      which of the PBL IPs signals volunteered data and which signals SpamHaus
      additional data, but it is reasonable to assume that the two distinct
      IP addresses are reserved for a reason.

      Given that 127.0.0.2 and 192.0.2.0 map to 127.0.0.11, and these are not
      volunteered by their ISPs, it looks .11 is SpamHaus data, and .10 is
      volunteered data.

      SpamHaus is not in the business of making it difficult for users to
      use their lists by mixing oil and water...

      --
      Viktor.

      Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
      Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.

      To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
      http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
      <mailto:majordomo@...?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>

      If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
      send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
      "It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
    • Joey
      When upgrading from 2.2.10 to 2.3.0 and then running the new version I get the following: Dec 1 08:47:42 pluto postfix/postfix-script: starting the Postfix
      Message 2 of 21 , Dec 1, 2006
      • 0 Attachment
        When upgrading from 2.2.10 to 2.3.0 and then running the new version I get
        the following:

        Dec 1 08:47:42 pluto postfix/postfix-script: starting the Postfix mail
        system
        Dec 1 08:47:42 pluto postfix/master[26822]: daemon started -- version
        2.3.0, configuration /etc/postfix
        Dec 1 08:47:44 pluto postfix/smtpd[26834]: warning: unsupported SASL server
        implementation: cyrus
        Dec 1 08:47:44 pluto postfix/smtpd[26834]: fatal: SASL per-process
        initialization failed
        Dec 1 08:47:45 pluto postfix/master[26822]: warning: process
        /usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd pid 26834 exit status 1
        Dec 1 08:47:45 pluto postfix/master[26822]: warning:
        /usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd: bad command startup -- throttling


        I compile postfix like this:
        make tidy
        make makefiles CCARGS="-DUSE_SASL_AUTH -I/usr/include/sasl"
        AUXLIBS="-L/usr/lib -lsasl2"
        make
        make upgrade


        I'm not really seeing the reason after searching google...

        Any help appreciated.

        Joey
      • Ralf Hildebrandt
        ... You didn t read the RELEASE_NOTES! [Incompat 20051220] The Postfix-with-Cyrus-SASL build procedure has changed. You now need to specify -DUSE_CYRUS_SASL in
        Message 3 of 21 , Dec 1, 2006
        • 0 Attachment
          * Joey <Joey@...>:

          > I compile postfix like this:
          > make tidy
          > make makefiles CCARGS="-DUSE_SASL_AUTH -I/usr/include/sasl"
          > AUXLIBS="-L/usr/lib -lsasl2"
          > make
          > make upgrade

          You didn't read the RELEASE_NOTES!

          [Incompat 20051220] The Postfix-with-Cyrus-SASL build procedure has
          changed. You now need to specify -DUSE_CYRUS_SASL in addition to
          -DUSE_SASL_AUTH or else you end up without any Cyrus SASL support.
          The error messages are:

          unsupported SASL server implementation: cyrus
          unsupported SASL client implementation: cyrus

          --
          Ralf Hildebrandt (Ralf.Hildebrandt@...) plonk@...
          Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
          http://www.postfix-buch.com
          PP: MMDF gone mad with standards fever. Think "Brazil".
        Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.