Re: update, was: partial solution, was: Upgrade postfix 2.0.3 to 2.2.10
- On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 10:10:38AM +0200, Magnus B?ck wrote:
> On Monday, May 01, 2006 at 02:45 CEST,Any any relevant aliases(5) table entries, verified with "postmap -q
> Andrej Ricnik-Bay <andrej.groups@...> wrote:
> > So the problem is now, I suppose, why my alias gets ignored even
> > though it's in an alias-file that postfix knows about.
> > mail1 postfix/local: [ID 197553 mail.info] 4ADAEFC5:
> > to=<our_pagers@...>, orig_to=<andrej@...>,
> > relay=local, delay=0, status=bounced (unknown user: "our_pagers")
> Okay, so why does the rewriting
> andrej@... -> our_pagers@...
> take place? And what should've happened instead? Show the contents of
> the canonical and virtual rewriting tables.
P.S. Morgan Stanley is looking for a New York City based, Senior Unix
system/email administrator to architect and sustain the Unix email
environment. If you are interested, please drop me a note.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.