Re: Soft_Error_Limit/Sleep Time
- On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 01:25:48PM -0500, David Cary Hart wrote:
> (I'm doing one of those main.cf parameter reviews to remember what INo, the opposite, tarpitting *consumes* resources (smtpd/cleanup
> forgot -;))
> I know that this will slow down a worm determined to reach the hard
> limit. Would I be correct in assuming that this would also free up
> resources for other clients connecting at the same time?
processes) on your server, by making the bad sessions last
longer. Connections are cheaper for the spammer than for you, so on the
whole you don't want to do it.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.