298980Re: transport_maps "loops back to myself"
- Mar 27, 2014Viktor Dukhovni:
> Of course you can. You're just not listening carefully. YourI'm failing to grasp the concept and can't find any working examples online...
Finding this thread
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/203958 has helped a
> sender dependent maps would actually largely ignore the sender,But how to I define the sender (map), if that's not asking too much,
could you please provide me with an example file?
> and just provide a round-robin response. The important part isAnd therefore would cut the overhead I currently have, right?
> that this mechanism returns a "default_transport" which never
> overrides local or other more specific transport information.
> ... can help avoid unnecessarily splitting of
> the envelope for multi-recipient mail. You should try to send all
> the cache might defeat the load-balancing you want.yep!
> Use socketmap (or the obsolete tcp table) with:(mental note: this surely is the right way to do it, not the way I've done it.)
> Don't bother logging the queries except briefly if you're unsureI'm just logging while debugging..
> it is working.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>