294997Re: Significantly different date observed in Received and Date fields
- Aug 26, 2013On 25 Aug 2013, at 22:41 , Mike Seda <mike@...> wrote:
> It's possible to modify the Date field on MUA side, if one were so inclined, right?Yes, but I am having trouble thinking of a case where it is really actually truly a good idea.
> If so, how would that be accomplished?I'd use procmail and formail? You could add a header X-Date-Received or simply overwrite the header, or even do something like put the contents of Date: into X-Old-Date and write the current date into a new Date:
It's not as trivial as you might think to do it right. For example, you would need to account for pesky things like time zones.
Also, if you use Maildir, the 'header' date is not really that important; it is the date stamp when the file was written that determines sorting, for example.
I did this long ago in procmail to 'repair' some mbox files (so it rewrote the FROM_ header), but when I had to reprocess a bunch of mail that was munged, I had to grab the date out of the received header for my server and parse it to reformat it for the FROM_ header. The idea should be basically the same for rewriting the Date header, but is probably easier as I think, generally, Received dates and Date: headers are the same format?
Received: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 22:42:02 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 00:41:35 -0400
Almost the same. Almost.
If I were doing it now I would probably do something like feed the Received date into gnu date with a timezone change, and use the output to set the new header; that should work pretty easily.
$ gdate --date='TZ="-0600" Mon, 26 Aug 2013 00:41:35 -0400'
Sun Aug 25 22:41:35 MDT 2013
Put in a comma and the timezone offset -0600 and Robert is your mother's brother.
I may write something to rename the Maildir files (which use an epoch timestamp) to the correct epoch time for their Date: headers. I have a few thousand messages from 2009 that sort incorrectly because their names are wrong in the maildir.
Nihil est--in vita priore ego imperator Romanus fui.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>