Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

293760Re: Bulk Mailing Performance

Expand Messages
  • Roel Wagenaar
    Jun 12, 2013
      wietse@... (Wietse Venema) wrote:

      > fletch:
      > > The postfix performance claims made via this thread are far-fetched to
      say
      > > the least. Most postfix users will only see outbound throughput in the
      > > range of ~250,000/hour per instance in a production setting. Yet,
      people on
      > > here are claiming 10 million/hour? I guess that would be possible if a
      > > sender were to run, say, 40 postfix instances which would be a complete
      > > management nightmare of course.
      > >
      > > Obviously, vendors like Port25 (company behind PowerMTA) and GreenArrow
      > > would not be able to make any sales if the benefits of commercial
      software
      > > products v. open source were not substantial.
      >
      > Is this a troll?



      Obviously YES.


      And quite a lot of feeders too.


      > I have documented Postfix performance claims on Wikipedia. Be sure
      > to read the cautionary note about factors outside of Postfix that
      > in practice limit the delivery performance.
      >
      > Wietse
      >
      >

      DFTT


      --
      Roel Wagenaar,

      Linux-User #469851 with the Linux Counter; http://linuxcounter.net/

      Antw.: Omdat het de volgorde verstoord waarin mensen tekst lezen.
      Vraag: Waarom is top-posting een slechte gewoonte?
      Antw.: Top-posting.
      Vraag: Wat is het meest ergerlijke in e-mail?

      Diplomacy is the art of letting someone else get your way.
    • Show all 30 messages in this topic