Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

293532Re: Is it time for 2.x.y -> x.y?

Expand Messages
  • Victor d'Agostino
    Jun 1, 2013
    • 0 Attachment
      Gentlemen,

      Don't feed the troll !

      Regards,
      Victor

      Le 01/06/2013 15:42, Ove Evensen a écrit :
      I would say keep it as normal.  2.9 and then 2.10.
      If you can not see the difference between 2.1 and 2.10 you should not use postfix.  Period! 




      Regards
      Ove Jk. Evensen



      -------- Original message --------
      From: Linux Addict <linuxaddict7@...>
      Date: 01/06/2013 14:02 (GMT+00:00)
      To: Len Conrad <LConrad@...>
      Cc: postfix-users@...
      Subject: Re: Is it time for 2.x.y -> x.y?


      After 2.9, it should have been 3, not 2.10 ;)



      Sent from my iPhone

      On Jun 1, 2013, at 8:33 AM, Len Conrad <LConrad@...> wrote:

      > At 07:18 AM 6/1/2013, you wrote:
      >> Am 31.05.2013 22:56, schrieb Wietse Venema:
      >>> After the confusion that Postfix 2.10 is not Postfix 2.1, maybe it
      >>> is time to change the release numbering scheme.
      >
      > don't dumb postfix down.  keep the current numbering style.
      >
      > Len
      >
      >
      >

    • Show all 30 messages in this topic