293532Re: Is it time for 2.x.y -> x.y?
- Jun 1 8:15 AMGentlemen,
Don't feed the troll !
Le 01/06/2013 15:42, Ove Evensen a écrit :I would say keep it as normal. 2.9 and then 2.10.If you can not see the difference between 2.1 and 2.10 you should not use postfix. Period!RegardsOve Jk. Evensen
-------- Original message --------
From: Linux Addict <linuxaddict7@...>
Date: 01/06/2013 14:02 (GMT+00:00)
To: Len Conrad <LConrad@...>
Subject: Re: Is it time for 2.x.y -> x.y?
After 2.9, it should have been 3, not 2.10 ;)
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 1, 2013, at 8:33 AM, Len Conrad <LConrad@...> wrote:
> At 07:18 AM 6/1/2013, you wrote:
>> Am 31.05.2013 22:56, schrieb Wietse Venema:
>>> After the confusion that Postfix 2.10 is not Postfix 2.1, maybe it
>>> is time to change the release numbering scheme.
> don't dumb postfix down. keep the current numbering style.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>