291556Re: Support for MDB in postfix 2.10?
- Feb 25, 2013On 02/25/2013 07:19 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> FYI, in order to maintain Postfix in a meaningful manner I need toGot it. I'll see what it takes to get this RPM included in Fedora and
> know what the library will look like on OTHER people's systems.
> Therefore I will wait until there is a package for a mainstream
> LINUX or *BSD distribution that OTHER people can install by typing
> one or two commands.
EPEL. If accepted that would cover Fedora, RHEL and CentOS.
> Howard's Postfix client code from a few months ago requires mdb.hJudging from the git commit log, on Nov 12, 2012 the "l" was added due
> and libmdb.*. On the other hand your SRPM appears to install lmdb.h
> and liblmdb.*. Is this the beginning of a Babylonian confusion?
> What names will real systems use?
to a naming conflict with other mdb* packages. See commit:
So the correct name is lmdb (liblmdb.so and lmdb.h).
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>