291514Re: header_checks issue
- Feb 22, 2013Deeztek.com Support:
> On February 22, 2013 3:40:22 PM Viktor DukhovniTypically this would be done with virtual aliases that send
> <postfix-users@...> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 03:13:27PM -0500, Deeztek.com Support wrote:
> > > >bob@... smtp:[18.104.22.168]
> > > >mary@... smtp:[22.214.171.124]
> > > >example.com smtp:somewhere.else
> > >
> > > Sorry about the top-posting. Okay this is a little bit closer. So,
> > > I'm assuming if I use the domain in conjuction with recipients for
> > > the same domain the transport line for the domain has to point
> > > somewhere completely different than the recipient lines? In other
> > > words I can't have the following?
> > >
> > > bob@... smtp:[126.96.36.199]
> > > mary@... smtp:[188.8.131.52]
> > > example.com smtp:[184.108.40.206]
> > You can, but the bob entry is redundant. I don't recommend per-mailbox
> > transport entries at all, it is best to stick to per-domain transport
> > entries only, and handle per-user routing via virtual(5) alias rewriting.
bob@... to bob@...
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>