291449Re: HOLDing certain recipients during migration
- Feb 19, 2013On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 13:13:54 +0100, Miha Valencic wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Noel Jones <njones@...> wrote:I do not understand your response; the HOLD action is not a temporary
> > HOLD acts at the message level, not the recipient level.
> > If one recipient of a multi-recipient message is put on HOLD, all
> > recipients of that message will be affected.
> I see. I believe the HOLD is better suited to our scenario as a
> temporary reject and this (HOLDing messages for all recipients if one
> matches) is acceptable.
reject. Anyway, my involvement earlier in the thread is for others who
might chance upon this chain in the archives, and prefer the alternative
(and IMHO more robust) approach.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>