289934Re: Holding Email from Specific Sender
- Dec 6, 2012On 12/6/2012 5:26 PM, Dan Lists wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Noel Jones <njones@...> wrote:If the message was accepted and placed on hold, then it didn't hit
>> On 12/6/2012 4:29 PM, Dan Lists wrote:
>>> We relay email for our customers. They had some accounts Phished. I
>>> wanted to hold email from those users so I could see the spam that was
>>> going out and requeue the valid email.
>>> In main.cf I have:
>>> smtpd_sender_restrictions =
>>> check_sender_access hash:$config_directory/sender_domains,
>>> sender_domains has:
>>> user@... HOLD
>>> domain.tld OK
>>> What user@... sends email I get:
>>> Dec 6 16:14:26 mailserver postfix/smtpd: NOQUEUE: hold: RCPT
>>> from clientserv[220.127.116.11]: <user@...>: Sender address
>>> triggers HOLD action; from=<user@...> to=<recip@...>
>>> proto=ESMTP helo=<clientserv>
>>> Dec 6 16:14:26 mailserver postfix/smtpd: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
>>> from clientserv[18.104.22.168]: 554 5.7.1 <user@...>: Sender
>>> address rejected: Access denied; from=<user@...>
>>> to=<recip@...> proto=ESMTP helo=<clientserv>
>>> What am I doing wrong?
>> Just a misconception... HOLD does not immediately freeze the
>> message, nor does it instruct postfix to accept the message.
>> Processing continues and a later restriction can still reject the
> Interesting. It worked when I did something similar in
> smtpd_client_restrictions =
> check_client_access hash:$config_directory/client_access
> 22.214.171.124 HOLD
> Is that because the smtpd_client_restrictions does not have reject listed?
any reject rules in any of the smtpd_*_restrictions, nor in
>Yes, I was assuming it was internal mail.
>> Probably the easiest solution here it to create your own HOLD_OK
>> action so it works as you expect.
>> # main.cf
>> smtpd_restriction_classes =
>> HOLD_OK =
>> check_client_access static:hold
> We are relaying for them, so I assume I would want to leave out
-- Noel Jones
>> Then, in your sender_domain file,
>> user@... HOLD_OK
>> domain.tld OK
>> -- Noel Jones
- << Previous post in topic