Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

288067SOLVED: Re: headers_check confusion

Expand Messages
  • anant@isac.gov.in
    Sep 5, 2012
    • 0 Attachment
      Dear All who supported me,

      Especially Wietse Venema, Noel Jones and Mark Martinec and others.


      Final conclusion for me was, header_checks is not the best way to
      handle my problem. Setup separate instances in Postfix and as guided
      by Noel Jones and Mark Martinec setup amavisd-new to listen on
      multiple ports and setup a policy bank.

      This has solved my problem.

      Thanks to these wonderful solutions of Postfix, Amavisd-new, ClamAV
      and SPAMAssassin and many more.

      Regards,
      Anant.

      ----- Message from Wietse Venema <wietse@...> ---------
      Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 09:13:09 -0400 (EDT)
      From: Wietse Venema <wietse@...>
      Subject: Re: headers_check confusion
      To: anant@...
      Cc: postfix-users@...


      > anant@...:
      >> Dear List,
      >>
      >> I have following header_check
      >>
      >> /^X-ABC:.*XYZ.*/ DUNNO
      >
      > This matches X-ABC: followed by whatever, followed by XYZ.
      >
      >> !/^X-ABC:.*XYZ.*/ FILTER smtp:a.b.c.d:yyyy
      >
      > This matches ALL OTHER MESSAGE HEADERS.
      >
      > Wietse


      ----- End message from Wietse Venema <wietse@...> -----


      ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for
      the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
      privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
      distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
      contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
      message.
      ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    • Show all 3 messages in this topic