279132Re: patch proposal
- Aug 3 7:23 AMHari Hendaryanto:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> On 8/2/2011 2:29 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:Sorry, tcp:/path/name is bad user interface design. Everywhere else
> > Hari Hendaryanto:
> >> Hello,
> >> I've created a patch that mimicked tcp_table. however, the table lookups
> >> are directed to a unix domain socket instead of tcp servers.
> >> Actually, the patch itself is a modification of the source code of
> >> tcp_table.
> >> Map names have the form usock:/path/to/socket
> >> If i'm not on the right path, can i request similiar feature.? (it would
> >> be great to have both tcp|unix-domain-socket_table)
> >> tcp_table is great, its simple protocol allows us to talk to various
> >> applications.
> > This really sounds like a name space design issue, since the
> > map-specific protocol does not change.
> > foo:tcp:host:port
> > foo:unix:/pathname
> > foo:tls:tcp:host:port
> > This needs further thought.
> > Wietse
> I have another scenario
in Postfix, one has to specify the socket TYPE before the socket
NAME (with BC compatibility for programs such as the SMTP client
or TCP map that were desigined initially for TCP sockets only).
> The reason why i wanted this feature is, by using unix domain socket iAnd I have to consider the longer-term issue of keeping the system
> can protect my backend server from interference on multiuser environment.
> while tcp server is adequate for my single administrator/user
> environment server.
usable as it evolves. This means I will fight to keep the use
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>