Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

279116Re: patch proposal

Expand Messages
  • Hari Hendaryanto
    Aug 3, 2011
      On 8/2/2011 2:29 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
      > Hari Hendaryanto:
      >> Hello,
      >>
      >> I've created a patch that mimicked tcp_table. however, the table lookups
      >> are directed to a unix domain socket instead of tcp servers.
      >> Actually, the patch itself is a modification of the source code of
      >> tcp_table.
      >>
      >> Map names have the form usock:/path/to/socket
      >>
      >> If i'm not on the right path, can i request similiar feature.? (it would
      >> be great to have both tcp|unix-domain-socket_table)
      >> tcp_table is great, its simple protocol allows us to talk to various
      >> applications.
      >>
      > This really sounds like a name space design issue, since the
      > map-specific protocol does not change.
      >
      > foo:tcp:host:port
      > foo:unix:/pathname
      > foo:tls:tcp:host:port
      >
      > This needs further thought.
      >
      > Wietse
      >
      >
      >
      I have another scenario

      tcp:host:port
      tcp:/path/name

      The reason why i wanted this feature is, by using unix domain socket i
      can protect my backend server from interference on multiuser environment.
      while tcp server is adequate for my single administrator/user
      environment server.

      TIA


      Powered By http://www.3g-net.net
    • Show all 6 messages in this topic