273705Re: Spam Backscatter
- Feb 1, 2011On 2/1/2011 6:39 PM, Simon wrote:
>[Please post in plain text. Your mail would be easier to read
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Noel Jones
> <njones@... <mailto:njones@...>> wrote:
> Return-Path: <soa@*
> Received: from 195-191-72-102.optolan.net.ua
> <http://195-191-72-102.optolan.net.ua> (unknown
> The client 126.96.36.199 is listed in zen.spamhaus.org
> <http://zen.spamhaus.org>. I would start with using
> reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
> <http://zen.spamhaus.org> somewhere in your config.
> And then add the backscatter.org <http://backscatter.org>
> RBL as someone else suggested.
> http://www.backscatterer.org/?target=usage (see the
> postfix section)
> Hmm - thats interesting: our config allready as:
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org <http://zen.spamhaus.org>,
> Do i need to setup sender restrictions as well?
without the html mangling]
Does your maillog contain examples of other hosts being
rejected by zen?
# grep 'reject:.*zen.spamhaus' /path/to/maillog
If yes, then everything is OK; likely that client simply
wasn't yet listed when the mail arrived at your server.
If you don't have any rejects from zen in your log, maybe your
config is broken, or maybe zen doesn't answer your IP due to
If you need help with your config, show "postconf -n" output.
-- Noel Jones
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>