269552Re: Postscreen update
- Oct 1, 2010Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> I was going by information I received from another list. I don't useYes; CBL is a subset of XBL. It's not provided separately, at least
> the data feed service. Does this include the CBL data set within Zen?
not by Spamhaus. XBL alone is at least ~50x the size (on-disk) of the
other Zen subcomponents (PBL being the next largest).
> I would make an educated guess that the size of the CBL data set wouldSince Spamhaus ZEN is intended to be used as a no-FP blocklist, it's
> be over 100MB alone. 25 million 32bit IP addresses (4 bytes) would be
> 100MB, if my math is correct. 25 million bot infected hosts around the
> world seems like a very conservative estimate.
probably a lot less aggressive about listing these than some other lists
> Yeah, running the Spamhaus zones on local rbldnsd instances on each MXThe "magic" amounts to a couple of crontab entries:
> would require some distribution magic, as you state. Never done this
> myself. I'd be more inclined to go the route you've taken, if I were
> ever in a position to manage such a thing.
*/5 * * * * root rsync /path/to/spamhaus-in resolver1::rbldns
*/5 * * * * root rsync /path/to/spamhaus-in resolver2::rbldns
(I set up a script to only copy the actual zone data files - the inbound
Spamhaus sync sometimes leaves extra files lying around, I have to build
the local blacklist zone data from the database, and it's always nice to
trap errors of various kinds. But it's trivial enough any ISP sysadmin
should be able to hack out a similar wrapper in an hour or two.)
- << Previous post in topic