Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

245502Re: my question for nested_header_checks

Expand Messages
  • isobetti@u01.gate01.com
    Oct 31 6:39 PM
    • 0 Attachment
      Hi, Noel and Victor

      Thank you very much for your precious informations.
      I got it.

      Maybe I just have to use body_checks against broken format..


      --- postfix-users@... ---

      >On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:12:08AM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
      >> Anything else is just body text, even if it looks like a header.
      >> Standard bounces come with the original headers as an attached
      >> message; they can be examined by nested_header_checks. Some
      >> bounces arrive with the original headers included in body
      >> text; they must be examined by body_checks.
      >> While including your anti-backscatter rules in body_checks
      >> does increase the risk of false positives, IMO the increased
      >> risk is very slight, and outweighed by the benefit of
      >> detecting non-standard bounces.
      >The limitation is that "body_checks" works one line at a time and cannot
      >process folded headers in the message body. At this time there is no
      >support in the Postfix MIME parser for treating "text/rfc822-headers"
      >MIME parts as (nested) headers.
      > Viktor.
      >Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
      >Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
      >To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
      >http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
      >If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
      >send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
      >"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
    • Show all 4 messages in this topic